[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] xen: sched: make counters for vCPU sleep and wakeup generic
On 03/17/2015 10:48 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 17:18 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 02/27/2015 04:51 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > >>> diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c >>> index ad0a5d4..2b852cc 100644 >>> --- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c >>> +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c >>> @@ -931,6 +931,7 @@ csched2_vcpu_sleep(const struct scheduler *ops, struct >>> vcpu *vc) >>> struct csched2_vcpu * const svc = CSCHED2_VCPU(vc); >>> >>> BUG_ON( is_idle_vcpu(vc) ); >>> + SCHED_STAT_CRANK(vcpu_sleep); >>> >>> if ( per_cpu(schedule_data, vc->processor).curr == vc ) >>> cpu_raise_softirq(vc->processor, SCHEDULE_SOFTIRQ); >>> @@ -956,19 +957,22 @@ csched2_vcpu_wake(const struct scheduler *ops, struct >>> vcpu *vc) >>> >>> BUG_ON( is_idle_vcpu(vc) ); >>> >>> - /* Make sure svc priority mod happens before runq check */ >>> if ( unlikely(per_cpu(schedule_data, vc->processor).curr == vc) ) >>> { >>> + SCHED_STAT_CRANK(vcpu_wake_running); >>> goto out; >>> } >>> - >>> if ( unlikely(__vcpu_on_runq(svc)) ) >> >> Does this make the 'if' butt right up against the '{'? Is that bad? >> >> Other than that: >> >> Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > As far as I can see, the series is in: > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=8b0e94da0e23221a6d7ea19bfbd24a407db44de8 > > and whoever committed it (Jan, probably?), took care of leaving that > blank line in place, which I'm fine with, of course. :-) Sweet. :-) -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |