[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/7] xen: rework locking for dump of scheduler info (debug-key r)



>>> On 17.03.15 at 12:32, <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 11:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 17.03.15 at 12:05, <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 03/17/2015 10:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> Finally, as said in different contexts earlier, I think unconditionally
>>>> acquiring locks in dumping routines isn't the best practice. At least
>>>> in non-debug builds I think these should be try-locks only, skipping
>>>> the dumping when a lock is busy.
>>>
>>> You mean so that we don't block the console if there turns out to be a
>>> deadlock?
>> 
>> For example. And also to not unduly get in the way of an otherwise
>> extremely busy system.
> 
> I don't understand this last argument.  If you're using the debug keys,
> you want to know about the state of the system.  I would much rather my
> system ran 25% slower for the 5 seconds the debug key was dumping
> information, and have a complete snapshot of the system, than for it to
> only run 10% slower and to have half the information missing.  The
> upshot of missing information would likely be that I have to press the
> debug key 3-4 times in a row, meaning I'd be running 10% slower for 20
> seconds rather than 25% slower for 5 seconds.

Yes, I understand this, and in many cases this is the perspective to
take. Yet I've been in the situation where suggesting the use of
debug keys to learn something about a (partially) live locked system
would have had the risk of causing further corruption to it, and
hence a more careful state dumping approach would have been
desirable.

> All in all, I don't think the performance of the debug keys should be a
> major concern.  The only thing I'd be worried about is making the system
> as diagnosable as possible if things have already gone pear-shaped
> (e.g., if there's a deadlock).

It's not their performance that's of concern, but the effect they
may have on the performance (or even correctness - see how
many process_pending_softirqs() calls we had to sprinkle around
over the years) of other code.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.