[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/passthrough: Support a single iommu_domain per xen domain per SMMU
On Monday 23 March 2015 07:16 PM, Robbie VanVossen wrote: If multiple devices are being passed through to the same domain and they share a single SMMU, then they only require a single iommu_domain. In arm_smmu_assign_dev, before a new iommu_domain is created, the xen_domain->contexts is checked for any iommu_domains that are already assigned to device that uses the same SMMU as the current device. If one is found, attach the device to that iommu_domain. If a new one isn't found, create a new iommu_domain just like before. The arm_smmu_deassign_dev function assumes that there is a single device per iommu_domain. This meant that when the first device was deassigned, the iommu_domain was freed and when another device was deassigned a crash occured in xen. To fix this, a reference counter was added to the iommu_domain struct. When an arm_smmu_xen_device references an iommu_domain, the iommu_domains ref is incremented. When that reference is removed, the iommu_domains ref is decremented. The iommu_domain will only be freed when the ref is 0. Signed-off-by: Robbie VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi,Are you adding a PCI passthrough support to Xen ?. I am in process of sending smmu driver patches based on juliens latest code. --- Changed since v1: * Fixed coding style for comments * Move increment/decrement outside of attach/detach functions * Expanded xen_domain->lock to protect more of the assign/deassign functions * Removed iommu_domain add/remove_device functions --- xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c index a7a7da9..1a3de00 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ struct iommu_domain /* Runtime SMMU configuration for this iommu_domain */ struct arm_smmu_domain *priv;+ atomic_t ref;/* Used to link iommu_domain contexts for a same domain. * There is at least one per-SMMU to used by the domain. * */ @@ -2569,7 +2570,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_assign_dev(struct domain *d, u8 devfn, { struct iommu_domain *domain; struct arm_smmu_xen_domain *xen_domain; - int ret; + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu; + int ret = 0; + int existing_ctxt_fnd = 0;xen_domain = domain_hvm_iommu(d)->arch.priv; @@ -2585,36 +2588,77 @@ static int arm_smmu_assign_dev(struct domain *d, u8 devfn,return ret; }+ spin_lock(&xen_domain->lock);+ /* - * TODO: Share the context bank (i.e iommu_domain) when the device is - * under the same SMMU as another device assigned to this domain. - * Would it useful for PCI + * Check to see if a context bank (iommu_domain) already exists for + * this xen domain under the same SMMU */ - domain = xzalloc(struct iommu_domain); - if (!domain) - return -ENOMEM; + if (!list_empty(&xen_domain->contexts)) { + smmu = find_smmu_for_device(dev); + if (!smmu) { + dev_err(dev, "cannot find SMMU\n"); + ret = -ENXIO; + goto out; + }- ret = arm_smmu_domain_init(domain);- if (ret) - goto err_dom_init; + /* + * Loop through the &xen_domain->contexts to locate a context + * assigned to this SMMU + */ + list_for_each_entry(domain, &xen_domain->contexts, list) { + if(domain->priv->smmu == smmu) + { + /* + * We have found a context already associated with the + * same xen domain and SMMU + */ + ret = arm_smmu_attach_dev(domain, dev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, + "cannot attach device to already existing iommu_domain\n"); + goto out; + } + atomic_inc(&domain->ref); + + existing_ctxt_fnd = 1; + break; + } + } + }- domain->priv->cfg.domain = d;+ if(!existing_ctxt_fnd){- ret = arm_smmu_attach_dev(domain, dev);- if (ret) - goto err_attach_dev; + domain = xzalloc(struct iommu_domain); + if (!domain) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out; + }- spin_lock(&xen_domain->lock);- /* Chain the new context to the domain */ - list_add(&domain->list, &xen_domain->contexts); - spin_unlock(&xen_domain->lock); + ret = arm_smmu_domain_init(domain); + if (ret) + goto err_dom_init;- return 0;+ domain->priv->cfg.domain = d; + + ret = arm_smmu_attach_dev(domain, dev); + if (ret) + goto err_attach_dev; + atomic_inc(&domain->ref); + + /* Chain the new context to the domain */ + list_add(&domain->list, &xen_domain->contexts); + + } + + goto out;err_attach_dev:arm_smmu_domain_destroy(domain); err_dom_init: xfree(domain); +out: + spin_unlock(&xen_domain->lock);return ret;} @@ -2631,14 +2675,20 @@ static int arm_smmu_deassign_dev(struct domain *d, struct device *dev) return -ESRCH; }+ spin_lock(&xen_domain->lock);+ arm_smmu_detach_dev(domain, dev); + atomic_dec(&domain->ref);- spin_lock(&xen_domain->lock);- list_del(&domain->list); - spin_unlock(&xen_domain->lock); + if (domain->ref.counter == 0) + { + list_del(&domain->list);- arm_smmu_domain_destroy(domain);- xfree(domain); + arm_smmu_domain_destroy(domain); + xfree(domain); + } + + spin_unlock(&xen_domain->lock);return 0;} _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |