[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit 1aeb1156fa43fe2cd2b5003995b20466cd19a622: "x86 don't change affinity with interrupt unmasked", APCI errors and assorted pci trouble



On 28/03/15 20:10, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Saturday, March 28, 2015, 6:30:39 PM, you wrote:
>
>> On 28/03/15 15:34, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> Commit 1aeb1156fa43fe2cd2b5003995b20466cd19a622:
>>> "x86 don't change affinity with interrupt unmasked",
>>> gives trouble on my AMD box, symptoms:
>>> - APIC errors in xl dmesg that weren't previously there:
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.085] IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (6-13 -> 
>>> 0x88 -> IRQ 13 Mode:0 Active:0)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.101] PCI: Using MCFG for segment 0000 bus 00-ff
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.097] IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (6-8 -> 
>>> 0x58 -> IRQ 8 Mode:0 Active:0)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.112] IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (6-18 -> 
>>> 0xb8 -> IRQ 18 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.189] IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (6-17 -> 
>>> 0xc0 -> IRQ 17 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.420] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-29 -> 
>>> 0xc8 -> IRQ 53 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.420] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-24 -> 
>>> 0xd0 -> IRQ 48 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.420] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-30 -> 
>>> 0xd8 -> IRQ 54 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.420] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-12 -> 
>>> 0x21 -> IRQ 36 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.420] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-13 -> 
>>> 0x29 -> IRQ 37 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.421] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-16 -> 
>>> 0x31 -> IRQ 40 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.495] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-28 -> 
>>> 0x39 -> IRQ 52 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.498] IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (6-16 -> 
>>> 0x89 -> IRQ 16 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.498] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-14 -> 
>>> 0xa9 -> IRQ 38 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:37.548] IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (6-22 -> 
>>> 0xb9 -> IRQ 22 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:39.620] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-9 -> 
>>> 0xc1 -> IRQ 33 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:39.646] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-8 -> 
>>> 0xc9 -> IRQ 32 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:39.647] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-23 -> 
>>> 0xd1 -> IRQ 47 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:41.732] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-5 -> 
>>> 0xd9 -> IRQ 29 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:41.779] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-4 -> 
>>> 0x22 -> IRQ 28 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:41.803] mm.c:803: d0: Forcing read-only access to 
>>> MFN fed00
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:41.894] IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (6-19 -> 
>>> 0x2a -> IRQ 19 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:42.057] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-22 -> 
>>> 0x72 -> IRQ 46 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:42.093] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-27 -> 
>>> 0x8a -> IRQ 51 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>
>>>   these:
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:42.205] APIC error on CPU0: 00(40)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:42.372] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
>>>
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:42.691] d0 attempted to change d0v1's CR4 flags 
>>> 00000660 -> 00000760
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:42.691] IOAPIC[1]: Set PCI routing entry (7-1 -> 
>>> 0x9a -> IRQ 25 Mode:1 Active:1)
>>>
>>>   and this one:
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:42.707] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:43.958] d0 attempted to change d0v0's CR4 flags 
>>> 00000660 -> 00000760
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:43.970] d0 attempted to change d0v2's CR4 flags 
>>> 00000660 -> 00000760
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:43.988] d0 attempted to change d0v3's CR4 flags 
>>> 00000660 -> 00000760
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:43.992] d0 attempted to change d0v4's CR4 flags 
>>> 00000660 -> 00000760
>>>   (XEN) [2015-03-26 20:35:43.996] d0 attempted to change d0v5's CR4 flags 
>>> 00000660 -> 00000760
>>>   (d1) [2015-03-26 20:40:42.220] mapping kernel into physical memory
>>>   (d1) [2015-03-26 20:40:42.220] about to get started...
>>>
>>>
>>> - random failures on dom0 SATA devices, the SATA controller is using 
>>> multiple MSI 
>>>   interrupts.
>>>
>>> - failues on XHCI controllers passed through to a HVM guest which uses MSI-X
>>>   interrupts. Leading to these in the guest dmesg:
>>>   [  350.246548] xhci_hcd 0000:00:05.0: Looking for event-dma 
>>> 000000003cdf7140 trb-start 000000003cdf7240 trb-end 000000003cdf7240 
>>> seg-start 000000003cdf7000 seg-end 000000003cdf73f0
>>>   [  350.246548] xhci_hcd 0000:00:05.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr 
>>> not part of current TD ep_index 1 comp_code 1
>>>   [  350.246548] xhci_hcd 0000:00:05.0: Looking for event-dma 
>>> 000000003cdf7150 trb-start 000000003cdf7240 trb-end 000000003cdf7240 
>>> seg-start 000000003cdf7000 seg-end 000000003cdf73f0
>>>   [  350.246548] xhci_hcd 0000:00:05.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr 
>>> not part of current TD ep_index 1 comp_code 1
>>>
>>>
>>> Reverting this specific commit makes all the troubles go away ..
>> That is unfortunate, as conceptually the identified patch definitely
>> fixes a bug.
>> The "APIC error" messages have bit 6 set, which is "Receive Illegal
>> Vector".  i.e. a device has attempted to deliver an interrupt with a
>> vector field less than 16.  I presume that this means that the device is
>> ending up with a malformed data field programmed into it.
>> Can you identify the PCI sbdf's of the problematic devices, and collect
>> debug-keys Q, M and i on a working system so I can identify precisely
>> which of the MSI interrupt drivers is in use (Xen has several, depending
>> on exact hardware circumstance).  If you can, the same debug-keys with
>> the problematic changeset present might also be interesting.
>> ~Andrew
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The passed through xhci is 08:00.0
> The SATA controller is 00:11.0
>
> Most clear failure is on the xhci controller.
>
> The working and not working config only differ in the revert of the mentioned 
> commit.
>
> Attached are:
>
> - lspci in dom0 of the working config 
> - serial-log of the working config (with debug-keys Q, M and i after full 
> boot 
>   and guest start)
> - serial-log of the not working config (with debug-keys Q, M and i after full 
> boot and guest start)

Thanks.

As an utter longshot, can you give this patch a try?  Could you also see
about capturing an lspci in dom0 while the bad situation is manifesting
itself?

~Andrew

diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_intr.c
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_intr.c
index c1b76fb..439ba05 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_intr.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_intr.c
@@ -529,10 +529,12 @@ int amd_iommu_msi_msg_update_ire(
     } while ( PCI_SLOT(bdf) == PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) );
 
     if ( !rc )
+    {
         for ( i = 1; i < nr; ++i )
             msi_desc[i].remap_index = msi_desc->remap_index + i;
+        msg->data = data;
+    }
 
-    msg->data = data;
     return rc;
 }


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.