[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-blkback: define pr_fmt macro to avoid the duplication of DRV_PFX
El 31/03/15 a les 23.14, Tao Chen ha escrit: > Define pr_fmt macro with {xen-blkback: } prefix, then remove all use > of DRV_PFX in the pr and DPRINTK sentences. It will simplify the code. > > And if the pr sentences miss a \n, add it in the end. If the DPRINTK > sentences have redundant \n, remove it. It will format the code. > > These all make the readability of the code become better. Thanks for the patch. > Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <boby.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 62 > ++++++++++++++++++------------------- > drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h | 6 ---- > drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 18 ++++++----- > 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > [...] > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h > b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h > index 375d288..f620b5d 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h > @@ -44,12 +44,6 @@ > #include <xen/interface/io/blkif.h> > #include <xen/interface/io/protocols.h> > > -#define DRV_PFX "xen-blkback:" > -#define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) \ > - pr_debug(DRV_PFX "(%s:%d) " fmt ".\n", \ > - __func__, __LINE__, ##args) > - > - > /* > * This is the maximum number of segments that would be allowed in indirect > * requests. This value will also be passed to the frontend. > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c > b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c > index b33083e..0dbbfeb 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c > @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ > > */ > > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "xen-blkback: " fmt > +#define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) \ > + pr_debug("(%s:%d) " fmt ".\n", \ > + __func__, __LINE__, ##args) > + > #include <stdarg.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/kthread.h> > @@ -426,14 +431,14 @@ static int xen_vbd_create(struct xen_blkif *blkif, > blkif_vdev_t handle, > FMODE_READ : FMODE_WRITE, NULL); > > if (IS_ERR(bdev)) { > - DPRINTK("xen_vbd_create: device %08x could not be opened.\n", > + DPRINTK("xen_vbd_create: device %08x could not be opened", > vbd->pdevice); > return -ENOENT; > } > > vbd->bdev = bdev; > if (vbd->bdev->bd_disk == NULL) { > - DPRINTK("xen_vbd_create: device %08x doesn't exist.\n", > + DPRINTK("xen_vbd_create: device %08x doesn't exist", > vbd->pdevice); IMHO this two above should be made a pr_warn probably... > xen_vbd_free(vbd); > return -ENOENT; > @@ -452,7 +457,7 @@ static int xen_vbd_create(struct xen_blkif *blkif, > blkif_vdev_t handle, > if (q && blk_queue_secdiscard(q)) > vbd->discard_secure = true; > > - DPRINTK("Successful creation of handle=%04x (dom=%u)\n", > + DPRINTK("Successful creation of handle=%04x (dom=%u)", > handle, blkif->domid); ...and this should be turned into a plain pr_debug. And with that we can get rid of DPRINTK. Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |