|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/7] x86: improve psr scheduling code
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 04:14:24AM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Switching RMID from previous vcpu to next vcpu only needs to write
> MSR_IA32_PSR_ASSOC once. Write it with the value of next vcpu is enough,
> no need to write '0' first. Idle domain has RMID set to 0 and because MSR
> is already updated lazily, so just switch it as it does.
>
> Also move the initialization of per-CPU variable which used for lazy
> update from context switch to CPU starting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/domain.c | 7 +---
> xen/arch/x86/psr.c | 89
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> index 393aa26..73f5d7f 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -1443,8 +1443,6 @@ static void __context_switch(void)
> {
> memcpy(&p->arch.user_regs, stack_regs, CTXT_SWITCH_STACK_BYTES);
> vcpu_save_fpu(p);
> - if ( psr_cmt_enabled() )
> - psr_assoc_rmid(0);
> p->arch.ctxt_switch_from(p);
> }
>
> @@ -1469,11 +1467,10 @@ static void __context_switch(void)
> }
> vcpu_restore_fpu_eager(n);
> n->arch.ctxt_switch_to(n);
> -
> - if ( psr_cmt_enabled() && n->domain->arch.psr_rmid > 0 )
> - psr_assoc_rmid(n->domain->arch.psr_rmid);
> }
>
> + psr_ctxt_switch_to(n->domain);
> +
> gdt = !is_pv_32on64_vcpu(n) ? per_cpu(gdt_table, cpu) :
> per_cpu(compat_gdt_table, cpu);
> if ( need_full_gdt(n) )
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> index 2ef83df..c902625 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
>
> struct psr_assoc {
> uint64_t val;
> - bool_t initialized;
> };
>
> struct psr_cmt *__read_mostly psr_cmt;
> @@ -115,14 +114,6 @@ static void __init init_psr_cmt(unsigned int rmid_max)
> printk(XENLOG_INFO "Cache Monitoring Technology enabled\n");
> }
>
> -static int __init init_psr(void)
> -{
> - if ( (opt_psr & PSR_CMT) && opt_rmid_max )
> - init_psr_cmt(opt_rmid_max);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -__initcall(init_psr);
> -
> /* Called with domain lock held, no psr specific lock needed */
> int psr_alloc_rmid(struct domain *d)
> {
> @@ -168,26 +159,84 @@ void psr_free_rmid(struct domain *d)
> d->arch.psr_rmid = 0;
> }
>
> -void psr_assoc_rmid(unsigned int rmid)
> +static inline void psr_assoc_init(void)
> {
> - uint64_t val;
> - uint64_t new_val;
> struct psr_assoc *psra = &this_cpu(psr_assoc);
>
> - if ( !psra->initialized )
> - {
> + if ( psr_cmt_enabled() )
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PSR_ASSOC, psra->val);
> - psra->initialized = 1;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void psr_assoc_reg_read(struct psr_assoc *psra, uint64_t *reg)
> +{
> + *reg = psra->val;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void psr_assoc_reg_write(struct psr_assoc *psra, uint64_t reg)
> +{
> + if ( reg != psra->val )
> + {
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PSR_ASSOC, reg);
> + psra->val = reg;
> }
> - val = psra->val;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void psr_assoc_rmid(uint64_t *reg, unsigned int rmid)
> +{
> + *reg = (*reg & ~rmid_mask) | (rmid & rmid_mask);
> +}
> +
> +void psr_ctxt_switch_to(struct domain *d)
> +{
> + uint64_t reg;
> + struct psr_assoc *psra = &this_cpu(psr_assoc);
> +
> + psr_assoc_reg_read(psra, ®);
>
> - new_val = (val & ~rmid_mask) | (rmid & rmid_mask);
> - if ( val != new_val )
> + if ( psr_cmt_enabled() )
> + psr_assoc_rmid(®, d->arch.psr_rmid);
> +
> + psr_assoc_reg_write(psra, reg);
> +}
> +
> +static void psr_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + psr_assoc_init();
> +}
> +
> +static int cpu_callback(
> + struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> + unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
> +
> + switch ( action )
> + {
> + case CPU_STARTING:
> + psr_cpu_init(cpu);
> + break;
> + }
You could just make it
if ( action == CPU_STARTING )
psr_assoc_init();
return NOTIFY_DONE;
Instead of this big switch statement with casting and such.. Thought
oddly enough, your psr_assoc_init figures out the CPU by running
it with 'this_cpu'. Why not make psr_assoc_init()' accept the CPU value?
> +
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block cpu_nfb = {
> + .notifier_call = cpu_callback
> +};
> +
> +static int __init psr_presmp_init(void)
> +{
> + if ( (opt_psr & PSR_CMT) && opt_rmid_max )
> + init_psr_cmt(opt_rmid_max);
> +
> + if ( psr_cmt_enabled() )
Extra space.
> {
> - wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PSR_ASSOC, new_val);
> - psra->val = new_val;
> + psr_cpu_init(smp_processor_id());
> + register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb);
> }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> +presmp_initcall(psr_presmp_init);
>
> /*
> * Local variables:
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h
> index c6076e9..585350c 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h
> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static inline bool_t psr_cmt_enabled(void)
>
> int psr_alloc_rmid(struct domain *d);
> void psr_free_rmid(struct domain *d);
> -void psr_assoc_rmid(unsigned int rmid);
> +
> +void psr_ctxt_switch_to(struct domain *d);
>
> #endif /* __ASM_PSR_H__ */
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |