Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/9] raisin: add a component to build qemu_traditional

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 18:42 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, George Dunlap wrote:
> > On 04/15/2015 05:11 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 16:49 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > >>>>> It would be nice if there was a --wtih-system-qemu-trad= option, but
> > >>>>> that has been looked upon unfavourably by the maintainers.
> > >>>> Thanks for feedback!!
> > >>>> I think Raisin needs something like --with-system-qemu-trad=, so if Xen
> > >>>> doesn't provide it, we'll have to carry a patch in Raisin to do it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Do you have a link to the discussion or previously rejected patch?
> > >>>
> > >>> I am not sure that there was ever a patch - it may have been a
> > >>> discussion I had with ijc in person.
> > >>
> > >> Possibly I can't remember myself either.
> > >>
> > >>> I would be +1 for a --with-system-qemu-trad= option to mirror the
> > >>> --with-system-qemu, especially as I am now not the only advocate of one.
> > >>
> > >> In a pre-raisin world I suppose I thought it didn't make too much sense
> > >> to go through that churn if we weren't going to stop _all_
> > >> cloning/downloading from within xen.git.
> > >>
> > >> Personally I would have considered qemu-trad very much part of the long
> > >> tail wrt moving things out of xen.git, but anyway.
> > >>
> > >> I'd like to see raisin used/supported by osstest before we start
> > >> accepting thoe sorts of xen.git patches being suggested here.
> > > 
> > > I think we'll have to carry those patches in Raisin anyway, otherwise
> > > how are we supposed to be able to build xen 4.5? I don't think is
> > > reasonable to be able to build only 4.6 onward.
> > 
> > Why isn't that reasonable?  It's a completely new tool.
> > 
> > Speaking of which -- are we going to try to make any version of raisin
> > build any random version of Xen, or are we going to have "releases" of
> > raisin (and subsequent branches and tags in the raisin.git tree) for
> > each version we want to support?
> 
> If we cannot do any better, we can resort to that, but as a user I like
> the fact that I can use raisin to build any relatively modern xen
> version by simply specifying a tag.
> 
> We can figure out a way to detect whether we need to patch Xen and only
> in that case do it.

When Raisin is building Xen 4.5 or earlier it should just let xen.git
take care of cloning and building qemu-trad (and anything else which is
in xen 4.5 by default). Thinking about patching xen 4.5 on the fly for
this is just madness.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel