[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/hvm: introduce functions for HVMOP_get/set_param allowance checks
>>> On 05.05.15 at 11:25, <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeulich@xxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 01 May 2015 20:28 >> And I continue to think that retaining these comments would be useful for >> documentation purposes (even when switching to white lists - they should >> then remain explicit case labels grouped with the "default" one). And taking >> into consideration the comment change requested at the very top (which >> changes again in the 3rd patch), there could then perhaps be a distinction >> between "can't", "shouldn't", and "mustn't" (again solely serving doc >> purposes). >> > > Ok, if you don't mind have the extra functionally redundant case statements. Yes, I certainly don't mind those if they serve a purpose (documentation). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |