[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [RFC v2 01/15] Vt-d Posted-intterrupt (PI) design
Add the design doc for VT-d PI. Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> --- docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt | 332 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 332 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt diff --git a/docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt b/docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b1444c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/misc/vtd-pi.txt @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@ +Authors: Feng Wu <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> + +VT-d Posted-interrupt (PI) design for XEN + +Background +========== +With the development of virtualization, there are more and more device +assignment requirements. However, today when a VM is running with +assigned devices (such as, NIC), external interrupt handling for the assigned +devices always needs VMM intervention. + +VT-d Posted-interrupt is a more enhanced method to handle interrupts +in the virtualization environment. Interrupt posting is the process by +which an interrupt request is recorded in a memory-resident +posted-interrupt-descriptor structure by the root-complex, followed by +an optional notification event issued to the CPU complex. + +With VT-d Posted-interrupt we can get the following advantages: +- Direct delivery of external interrupts to running vCPUs without VMM +intervention +- Decrease the interrupt migration complexity. On vCPU migration, software +can atomically co-migrate all interrupts targeting the migrating vCPU. For +virtual machines with assigned devices, migrating a vCPU across pCPUs +either incur the overhead of forwarding interrupts in software (e.g. via VMM +generated IPIS), or complexity to independently migrate each interrupt targeting +the vCPU to the new pCPU. However, after enabling VT-d PI, the destination vCPU +of an external interrupt from assigned devices is stored in the IRTE (i.e. +Posted-interrupt Descriptor Address), when vCPU is migrated to another pCPU, +we will set this new pCPU in the 'NDST' filed of Posted-interrupt descriptor, this +make the interrupt migration automatic. + +Here is what Xen currently does for external interrupts from assigned devices: + +When a VM is running and an external interrupt from an assigned device occurs +for it. VM-EXIT happens, then: + +vmx_do_extint() --> do_IRQ() --> __do_IRQ_guest() --> hvm_do_IRQ_dpci() --> +raise_softirq_for(pirq_dpci) --> raise_softirq(HVM_DPCI_SOFTIRQ) + +softirq HVM_DPCI_SOFTIRQ is bound to dpci_softirq() + +dpci_softirq() --> hvm_dirq_assist() --> vmsi_deliver_pirq() --> vmsi_deliver() --> +vmsi_inj_irq() --> vlapic_set_irq() + +vlapic_set_irq() does the following things: +1. If CPU-side posted-interrupt is supported, call vmx_deliver_posted_intr() to deliver +the virtual interrupt via posted-interrupt infrastructure. +2. Else if CPU-side posted-interrupt is not supported, set the related vIRR in vLAPIC +page and call vcpu_kick() to kick the related vCPU. Before VM-Entry, vmx_intr_assist() +will help to inject the interrupt to guests. + +However, after VT-d PI is supported, when a guest is running in non-root and an +external interrupt from an assigned device occurs for it. No VM-Exit is needed, +the guest can handle this totally in non-root mode, thus avoiding all the above +code flow. + +Posted-interrupt Introduction +======================== +There are two components to the Posted-interrupt architecture: +Processor Support and Root-Complex Support + +- Processor Support +Posted-interrupt processing is a feature by which a processor processes +the virtual interrupts by recording them as pending on the virtual-APIC +page. + +Posted-interrupt processing is enabled by setting the process posted +interrupts VM-execution control. The processing is performed in response +to the arrival of an interrupt with the posted-interrupt notification vector. +In response to such an interrupt, the processor processes virtual interrupts +recorded in a data structure called a posted-interrupt descriptor. + +More information about APICv and CPU-side Posted-interrupt, please refer +to Chapter 29, and Section 29.6 in the Intel SDM: +http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/manuals/64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-manual-325462.pdf + +- Root-Complex Support +Interrupt posting is the process by which an interrupt request (from IOAPIC +or MSI/MSIx capable sources) is recorded in a memory-resident +posted-interrupt-descriptor structure by the root-complex, followed by +an optional notification event issued to the CPU complex. The interrupt +request arriving at the root-complex carry the identity of the interrupt +request source and a 'remapping-index'. The remapping-index is used to +look-up an entry from the memory-resident interrupt-remap-table. Unlike +with interrupt-remapping, the interrupt-remap-table-entry for a posted- +interrupt, specifies a virtual-vector and a pointer to the posted-interrupt +descriptor. The virtual-vector specifies the vector of the interrupt to be +recorded in the posted-interrupt descriptor. The posted-interrupt descriptor +hosts storage for the virtual-vectors and contains the attributes of the +notification event (interrupt) to be issued to the CPU complex to inform +CPU/software about pending interrupts recorded in the posted-interrupt +descriptor. + +More information about VT-d PI, please refer to +http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/intel-technology/vt-directed-io-spec.html + +Important Definitions +================== +There are some changes to IRTE and posted-interrupt descriptor after +VT-d PI is introduced: +IRTE: +Posted-interrupt Descriptor Address: the address of the posted-interrupt descriptor +Virtual Vector: the guest vector of the interrupt +URG: indicates if the interrupt is urgent + +Posted-interrupt descriptor: +The Posted Interrupt Descriptor hosts the following fields: +Posted Interrupt Request (PIR): Provide storage for posting (recording) interrupts (one bit +per vector, for up to 256 vectors). + +Outstanding Notification (ON): Indicate if there is a notification event outstanding (not +processed by processor or software) for this Posted Interrupt Descriptor. When this field is 0, +hardware modifies it from 0 to 1 when generating a notification event, and the entity receiving +the notification event (processor or software) resets it as part of posted interrupt processing. + +Suppress Notification (SN): Indicate if a notification event is to be suppressed (not +generated) for non-urgent interrupt requests (interrupts processed through an IRTE with +URG=0). + +Notification Vector (NV): Specify the vector for notification event (interrupt). + +Notification Destination (NDST): Specify the physical APIC-ID of the destination logical +processor for the notification event. + +Design Overview +============== +In this design, we will cover the following items: +1. Add a variable to control whether enable VT-d posted-interrupt or not. +2. VT-d PI feature detection. +3. Extend posted-interrupt descriptor structure to cover VT-d PI specific stuff. +4. Extend IRTE structure to support VT-d PI. +5. Introduce a new global vector which is used for waking up the blocked vCPU. +6. Update IRTE when guest modifies the interrupt configuration (MSI/MSIx configuration). +7. Update posted-interrupt descriptor during vCPU scheduling (when the state +of the vCPU is transmitted among RUNSTATE_running / RUNSTATE_blocked/ +RUNSTATE_runnable / RUNSTATE_offline). +8. How to wakeup blocked vCPU when an interrupt is posted for it (wakeup notification handler). +9. New boot command line for Xen, which controls VT-d PI feature by user. +10. Multicast/broadcast and lowest priority interrupts consideration. + + +Implementation details +=================== +- New variable to control VT-d PI + +Like variable 'iommu_intremap' for interrupt remapping, it is very straightforward +to add a new one 'iommu_intpost' for posted-interrupt. 'iommu_intpost' is set +only when interrupt remapping and VT-d posted-interrupt are both enabled. + +- VT-d PI feature detection. +Bit 59 in VT-d Capability Register is used to report VT-d Posted-interrupt support. + +- Extend posted-interrupt descriptor structure to cover VT-d PI specific stuff. +Here is the new structure for posted-interrupt descriptor: + +struct pi_desc { + DECLARE_BITMAP(pir, NR_VECTORS); + union { + struct + { + u64 on : 1, + sn : 1, + rsvd_1 : 13, + ndm : 1, + nv : 8, + rsvd_2 : 8, + ndst : 32; + }; + u64 control; + }; + u32 rsvd[6]; + } __attribute__ ((aligned (64))); + +- Extend IRTE structure to support VT-d PI. + +Here is the new structure for IRTE: +/* interrupt remap entry */ +struct iremap_entry { + union { + struct { u64 lo, hi; }; + struct { + u64 p : 1, + fpd : 1, + dm : 1, + rh : 1, + tm : 1, + dlm : 3, + avail : 4, + res_1 : 4, + vector : 8, + res_2 : 8, + dst : 32; + u64 sid : 16, + sq : 2, + svt : 2, + res_3 : 44; + }remap; + struct { + u64 p : 1, + fpd : 1, + res_1 : 6, + avail : 4, + res_2 : 2, + urg : 1, + im : 1, + vector : 8, + res_3 : 14, + pda_l : 26; + u64 sid : 16, + sq : 2, + svt : 2, + res_4 : 12, + pda_h : 32; + }post; + }; +}; + +- Introduce a new global vector which is used to wake up the blocked vCPU. + +Currently, there is a global vector 'posted_intr_vector', which is used as the +global notification vector for all vCPUs in the system. This vector is stored in +VMCS and CPU considers it as a _special_ vector, uses it to notify the related +pCPU when an interrupt is recorded in the posted-interrupt descriptor. + +This existing global vector is a _special_ vector to CPU, CPU handle it in a +_special_ way compared to normal vectors, please refer to 29.6 in Intel SDM +http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/manuals/64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-manual-325462.pdf +for more information about how CPU handles it. + +After having VT-d PI, VT-d engine can issue notification event when the +assigned devices issue interrupts. We need add a new global vector to +wakeup the blocked vCPU, please refer to later section in this design for +how to use this new global vector. + +- Update IRTE when guest modifies the interrupt configuration (MSI/MSIx configuration). +After VT-d PI is introduced, the format of IRTE is changed as follows: + Descriptor Address: the address of the posted-interrupt descriptor + Virtual Vector: the guest vector of the interrupt + URG: indicates if the interrupt is urgent + Other fields continue to have the same meaning + +'Descriptor Address' tells the destination vCPU of this interrupt, since +each vCPU has a dedicated posted-interrupt descriptor. + +'Virtual Vector' tells the guest vector of the interrupt. + +When guest changes the configuration of the interrupts, such as, the +cpu affinity, or the vector, we need to update the associated IRTE accordingly. + +- Update posted-interrupt descriptor during vCPU scheduling + +The basic idea here is: +1. When vCPU's state is RUNSTATE_running, + - Set 'NV' to 'posted_intr_vector'. + - Clear 'SN' to accept posted-interrupts. + - Set 'NDST' to the pCPU on which the vCPU will be running. +2. When vCPU's state is RUNSTATE_blocked, + - Set 'NV' to ' pi_wakeup_vector ', so we can wake up the + related vCPU when posted-interrupt happens for it. + Please refer to the above section about the new global vector. + - Clear 'SN' to accept posted-interrupts +3. When vCPU's state is RUNSTATE_runnable/RUNSTATE_offline, + - Set 'SN' to suppress non-urgent interrupts + (Current, we only support non-urgent interrupts) + When vCPU is in RUNSTATE_runnable or RUNSTATE_offline, + It is not needed to accept posted-interrupt notification event, + since we don't change the behavior of scheduler when the interrupt + occurs, we still need wait the next scheduling of the vCPU. + When external interrupts from assigned devices occur, the interrupts + are recorded in PIR, and will be synced to IRR before VM-Entry. + - Set 'NV' to 'posted_intr_vector'. + +- How to wakeup blocked vCPU when an interrupt is posted for it (wakeup notification handler). + +Here is the scenario for the usage of the new global vector: + +1. vCPU0 is running on pCPU0 +2. vCPU0 is blocked and vCPU1 is currently running on pCPU0 +3. An external interrupt from an assigned device occurs for vCPU0, if we +still use 'posted_intr_vector' as the notification vector for vCPU0, the +notification event for vCPU0 (the event will go to pCPU1) will be consumed +by vCPU1 incorrectly (remember this is a special vector to CPU). The worst +case is that vCPU0 will never be woken up again since the wakeup event +for it is always consumed by other vCPUs incorrectly. So we need introduce +another global vector, naming 'pi_wakeup_vector' to wake up the blocked vCPU. + +After using 'pi_wakeup_vector' for vCPU0, VT-d engine will issue notification +event using this new vector. Since this new vector is not a SPECIAL one to CPU, +it is just a normal vector. To cpu, it just receives an normal external interrupt, +then we can get control in the handler of this new vector. In this case, hypervisor +can do something in it, such as wakeup the blocked vCPU. + +Here are what we do for the blocked vCPU: +1. Define a per-cpu list 'blocked_vcpu_on_cpu', which stored the blocked +vCPU on the pCPU. +2. When the vCPU's state is changed to RUNSTATE_blocked, insert the vCPU +to the per-cpu list belonging to the pCPU it was running. +3. When the vCPU is unblocked, remove the vCPU from the related pCPU list. + +In the handler of 'pi_wakeup_vector', we do: +1. Get the physical CPU. +2. Iterate the list 'blocked_vcpu_on_cpu' of the current pCPU, if 'ON' is set, +we unblock the associated vCPU. + +- New boot command line for Xen, which controls VT-d PI feature by user. + +Like 'intremap' for interrupt remapping, we add a new boot command line +'intpost' for posted-interrupts. + +- Multicast/broadcast and lowest priority interrupts consideration. + +With VT-d PI, the destination vCPU information of an external interrupt +from assigned devices is stored in IRTE, this makes the following +consideration of the design: +1. Multicast/broadcast interrupts cannot be posted. +2. For lowest-priority interrupts, new Intel CPU/Chipset/root-complex +(starting from Nehalem) ignore TPR value, and instead supported two other +ways (configurable by BIOS) on how the handle lowest priority interrupts: + A) Round robin: In this method, the chipset simply delivers lowest priority +interrupts in a round-robin manner across all the available logical CPUs. While +this provides good load balancing, this was not the best thing to do always as +interrupts from the same device (like NIC) will start running on all the CPUs +thrashing caches and taking locks. This led to the next scheme. + B) Vector hashing: In this method, hardware would apply a hash function +on the vector value in the interrupt request, and use that hash to pick a logical +CPU to route the lowest priority interrupt. This way, a given vector always goes +to the same logical CPU, avoiding the thrashing problem above. + +So, gist of above is that, lowest priority interrupts has never been delivered as +"lowest priority" in physical hardware. + +I will emulate vector hashing for posted-interrupt for XEN. -- 2.1.0 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |