[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] [RFC] x86/hvm: Permit HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT to be set more than once
>>> On 08.05.15 at 14:54, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There is no conceptual problem with setting this parameter more than once. > Checkpointed migration streams will typically set it once per checkpoint to > the same value. > > The parameter is only actually needed on early-generation VT-x which lacked > the unrestricted guest capability, although it could plausibly be used on > newer VT-x with unusual execution control settings. Short circuit the > expensive operations on non VT-x hardware. > > The parameter itself must always be latched to avoid issues if the VM > eventually migrates to a host which needs to use the pagetable. Reads all plausible, except that I think the way you carry out this last aspect needs adjustment: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -5730,12 +5730,13 @@ static int hvmop_set_param( > rc = -EINVAL; > break; > case HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT: > - rc = -EINVAL; > - if ( d->arch.hvm_domain.params[a.index] != 0 ) > - break; > - > rc = 0; > - if ( !paging_mode_hap(d) ) > + d->arch.hvm_domain.params[a.index] = a.value; > + /* > + * Only actually required for VT-x lacking unrestricted_guest > + * capabilities. Short circuit the pause if possible. > + */ > + if ( !paging_mode_hap(d) || !cpu_has_vmx ) > break; You should latch the new value inside this if()'s body and ... > @@ -5749,7 +5750,6 @@ static int hvmop_set_param( > > rc = 0; > domain_pause(d); > - d->arch.hvm_domain.params[a.index] = a.value; > for_each_vcpu ( d, v ) > paging_update_cr3(v); > domain_unpause(d); ... leave this one alone so the use site in VMX code won't see the new value prematurely. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |