Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] libxc/migrationv2: Split {start, end}_of_stream() to make checkpoint variants

[Hongyang Yang <yanghy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/08/2015 09:55 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/05/15 14:50, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 14:37 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > Does Remus currently function if the sending toolstack suddenly
> > > disappears out of the mix?
> > I would assume so, that's its entire purpose...
> But the signal to resume the domain properly involves setting
> last_checkpoint and wandering the recieve loop once more?
Please see my previous explain about Remus checkpoint and failover
Message-ID: <5550147B.1010304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If the sending toolstack suddenly disappears out of the mix, secondary
will recover from the last processed records which include the full
toolstack record.

> /me goes and checks the code more carefully.
>
> ~Andrew
> .
--
Thanks,
Yang.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel