[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: blkif.h: document linux xen-block multi-page ring implementation
> -----Original Message----- > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 15 May 2015 16:23 > To: Bob Liu; msw@xxxxxxxxxx; Paul Durrant; Keir (Xen.org) > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; David Vrabel; justing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Roger > Pau Monne > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: blkif.h: document linux xen-block multi-page ring > implementation > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:58:49PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > > After commit 1b1586eeeb8c ("xenbus_client: Extend interface to > > support multi-page ring"), Linux xenbus driver can support multi-page ring. > > > > Based on this interface, we got some impressive improvements by using > multi-page > > ring in xen-block driver. If using 64 pages as the ring, the IOPS increased > > about 15 times for the throughput testing. > > > > The Linux implementation reuses two 'DEPRECATED' nodes('max-ring- > pages' and > > 'num-ring-pages), so that nothing would be broken. > > Also removed the power of 2 limit and updated the default/max value > accordingly. > > Doing an git annotate shows: > > commit 829f2a9c6dfae13faee4e24b953441113338e0f2 > Author: Justin T. Gibbs <justing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu Feb 23 10:02:30 2012 +0000 > > blkif.h: Document the Red Hat and Citrix blkif multi-page ring extensions > > No functional changes. > > > Which says: > > * (1) Multi-page ring buffer scheme first developed in the Citrix XenServer > + * PV drivers. > + * (2) Multi-page ring buffer scheme first used in some RedHat distributions > + * including a distribution deployed on certain nodes of the Amazon > + * EC2 cluster. > + * (3) Support for multi-page ring buffers was implemented independently, > + * in slightly different forms, by both Citrix and RedHat/Amazon. > > > And I double checked the linux-2.6.18.hg tree and I see no mention of > multi-page. I wonder where such code exists? > > CC-ing Matt, perhaps he can help. > > Cc-ing Paul, perhaps he can help with the Citrix part. > The only code that has ever been deployed by Citrix, to my knowledge, is the Windows multi-page frontend code which uses the 'page-order' variants of the xenstore keys. I don't believe Citrix has ever shipped capable backends in XenServer, but it's possible Amazon implemented such a thing since they use Citrix drivers in their Windows guests. Paul > Thank you! > > P.S. > Also added Keir on the 'To' as scripts/get_maintainers.pl says he should be > on it. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > xen/include/public/io/blkif.h | 12 ++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/xen/include/public/io/blkif.h b/xen/include/public/io/blkif.h > > index 6baf7fb..0e34ae6 100644 > > --- a/xen/include/public/io/blkif.h > > +++ b/xen/include/public/io/blkif.h > > @@ -189,11 +189,11 @@ > > * > > * max-ring-pages > > * Values: <uint32_t> > > - * Default Value: 1 > > - * Notes: DEPRECATED, 2, 3 > > + * Default Value: 32 > > + * Notes: 2, 3 > > * > > * The maximum supported size of the request ring buffer in units of > > - * machine pages. The value must be a power of 2. > > + * machine pages. > > * > > *------------------------- Backend Device Properties > > ------------------------- > > * > > @@ -302,11 +302,11 @@ > > * num-ring-pages > > * Values: <uint32_t> > > * Default Value: 1 > > - * Maximum Value: MAX(max-ring-pages,(0x1 << max-ring-page- > order)) > > - * Notes: DEPRECATED, 2, 3 > > + * Maximum Value: max-ring-pages > > + * Notes: 2, 3 > > * > > * The size of the frontend allocated request ring buffer in units of > > - * machine pages. The value must be a power of 2. > > + * machine pages. > > * > > * feature-persistent > > * Values: 0/1 (boolean) > > -- > > 1.7.10.4 > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |