Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 12/13] xen-netfront: implement TX persistent grants

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 19/05/15 11:20, Joao Martins wrote:
> 
> On 18 May 2015, at 17:55, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 12/05/15 18:18, Joao Martins wrote:
>>> Instead of grant/revoking the buffer related to the skb, it will use
>>> an already granted page and memcpy  to it. The grants will be mapped
>>> by xen-netback and reused overtime, but only unmapped when the vif
>>> disconnects, as opposed to every packet.
>>>
>>> This only happens if the backend supports persistent grants since it
>>> would, otherwise, introduce the overhead of a memcpy on top of the
>>> grant map.
>> [...]
>>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>> [...]
>>> @@ -1610,7 +1622,10 @@ static int xennet_init_queue(struct netfront_queue 
>>> *queue)
>>>     for (i = 0; i < NET_TX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
>>>             skb_entry_set_link(&queue->tx_skbs[i], i+1);
>>>             queue->grant_tx[i].ref = GRANT_INVALID_REF;
>>> -           queue->grant_tx[i].page = NULL;
>>> +           if (queue->info->feature_persistent)
>>> +                   queue->grant_tx[i].page = alloc_page(GFP_NOIO);
>>
>> Need to check for alloc failure here and unwind correctly?
> Sorry, I overlooked this check. I will fix that.
> 
>> Why NOIO?
> May be I am misusing NOIO where I meant __GFP_WAIT.
> Tough given we are under rtnl_lock() perhaps GFP_ATOMIC should be used 
> instead.

rtnl_lock() is a mutex, so sleeping is allowed, so GFP_KERNEL is fine
here I think.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel