Re: [Xen-devel] [PING] [PING] [PATCH] tools/libxc: Fix build of 32bit toolstacks on CentOS 5.x following XSA-125

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This patch is still needed in all branches which currently contain
XSA-125, including staging.

~Andrew

On 13/05/15 12:42, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Ping again.
>
> These should be included in 4.5.1
>
> ~Andrew
>
> On 22/04/15 16:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Ping on the patches themselves?
>>
>> On 13/04/15 17:37, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 13/04/15 17:33, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>>> Andrew Cooper writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/libxc: Fix build of 32bit 
>>>> toolstacks on CentOS 5.x following XSA-125"):
>>>>> gcc 4.1 of CentOS 5.x era does not like the typecheck in min() between
>>>>> uint64_t and unsigned long.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> As and when this is acked and pushed to #staging, we should update the
>>>> advisory.
>>>>
>>>>> This needs backporting to 4.5
>>>> To be clear, do you know whether this is a trivial cherry pick ?
>>> It is trivial to cherrypick.
>>>
>>> 4.4 is the problematic case which I did the backport for separately, but
>>> then that is trivial to cherrypick back to 4.2
>>>
>>> ~Andrew
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel