Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 56898: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 21.05.15 at 21:30, <osstest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 56898 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56898/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop         fail REGR. vs. 
> 56728

This is recurring (i.e. presumably real), but none of the few changes
under test appear to be related in any way. And going through the
logs I can't spot anything suspicious either. Does anyone else have
a clue?

>  test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 15 
> rumpuserxen-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels.repeat fail REGR. vs. 56728

I suppose this (also recurring, and also seemingly unrelated to
any of the commits under test) is due to

device/vif = ""   (n0,r49)
device/vif/0 = ""   (n49,r0)
device/vif/0/backend = "/local/domain/0/backend/vif/49/0"   (n49,r0)
device/vif/0/backend-id = "0"   (n49,r0)
device/vif/0/state = "1"   (n49,r0)
device/vif/0/handle = "0"   (n49,r0)
rumpxenstack: xs_directory (device/vif/0/handle): Invalid argument

but I have no idea what conclusion to draw from that as to where
the problem might be.

(As a side note - can anyone explain why
elbling0---var-log-xen-console-guest-xenstorels.log.gz is gzip-ed
twice?)

> Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop          fail pass in 
> 56821
> 
> Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop              fail like 
> 56728

It is interesting to see that these seem to intermittently fail, so
perhaps the problem above is an older one...

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel