|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/13] xen-netback: copy buffer on xenvif_start_xmit()
On 19 May 2015, at 17:35, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:18:30PM +0200, Joao Martins wrote:
>> By introducing persistent grants we speed up the RX thread with the
>> decreased copy cost, that leads to a throughput decrease of 20%.
>> It is observed that the rx_queue stays mostly at 10% of its capacity,
>> as opposed to full capacity when using grant copy. And a finer measure
>> with lock_stat (below with pkt_size 64, burst 1) shows much higher wait
>> queue contention on queue->wq, which hints that the RX kthread is
>> waits/wake_up more often, that is actually doing work.
>>
>> Without persistent grants:
>>
>> class name con-bounces contentions waittime-min waittime-max
>> waittime-total waittime-avg acq-bounces acquisitions holdtime-min
>> holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> &queue->wq: 792 792 0.36 24.36
>> 1140.30 1.44 4208 1002671 0.00
>> 46.75 538164.02 0.54
>> ----------
>> &queue->wq 326 [<ffffffff8115949f>] __wake_up+0x2f/0x80
>> &queue->wq 410 [<ffffffff811592bf>] finish_wait+0x4f/0xa0
>> &queue->wq 56 [<ffffffff811593eb>] prepare_to_wait+0x2b/0xb0
>> ----------
>> &queue->wq 202 [<ffffffff811593eb>] prepare_to_wait+0x2b/0xb0
>> &queue->wq 467 [<ffffffff8115949f>] __wake_up+0x2f/0x80
>> &queue->wq 123 [<ffffffff811592bf>] finish_wait+0x4f/0xa0
>>
>> With persistent grants:
>>
>> &queue->wq: 61834 61836 0.32 30.12
>> 99710.27 1.61 241400 1125308 0.00
>> 75.61 1106578.82 0.98
>> ----------
>> &queue->wq 5079 [<ffffffff8115949f>] __wake_up+0x2f/0x80
>> &queue->wq 56280 [<ffffffff811592bf>] finish_wait+0x4f/0xa0
>> &queue->wq 479 [<ffffffff811593eb>] prepare_to_wait+0x2b/0xb0
>> ----------
>> &queue->wq 1005 [<ffffffff811592bf>] finish_wait+0x4f/0xa0
>> &queue->wq 56761 [<ffffffff8115949f>] __wake_up+0x2f/0x80
>> &queue->wq 4072 [<ffffffff811593eb>] prepare_to_wait+0x2b/0xb0
>>
>> Also, with persistent grants, we don't require batching grant copy ops
>> (besides the initial copy+map) which makes me believe that deferring
>> the skb to the RX kthread just adds up unnecessary overhead (for this
>> particular case). This patch proposes copying the buffer on
>> xenvif_start_xmit(), which lets us both remove the contention on
>> queue->wq and lock on rx_queue. Here, an alternative to
>> xenvif_rx_action routine is added namely xenvif_rx_map() that maps
>> and copies the buffer to the guest. This is only used when persistent
>> grants are used, since it would otherwise mean an hypercall per
>> packet.
>>
>> Improvements are up to a factor of 2.14 with a single queue getting us
>> from 1.04 Mpps to 1.7 Mpps (burst 1, pkt_size 64) and 1.5 to 2.6 Mpps
>> (burst 2, pkt_size 64) compared to using the kthread. Maximum with grant
>> copy is 1.2 Mpps, irrespective of the burst. All of this, measured on
>> an Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v2 @ 3.50GHz.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.martins@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h | 2 ++
>> drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c | 11 +++++---
>> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 52
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h
>> b/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h
>> index 23deb6a..f3ece12 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h
>> @@ -363,6 +363,8 @@ void xenvif_kick_thread(struct xenvif_queue *queue);
>>
>> int xenvif_dealloc_kthread(void *data);
>>
>> +int xenvif_rx_map(struct xenvif_queue *queue, struct sk_buff *skb);
>> +
>> void xenvif_rx_queue_tail(struct xenvif_queue *queue, struct sk_buff *skb);
>>
>> /* Determine whether the needed number of slots (req) are available,
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
>> b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
>> index 1103568..dfe2b7b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
>> @@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ static irqreturn_t xenvif_rx_interrupt(int irq, void
>> *dev_id)
>> {
>> struct xenvif_queue *queue = dev_id;
>>
>> - xenvif_kick_thread(queue);
>> + if (!queue->vif->persistent_grants)
>> + xenvif_kick_thread(queue);
>>
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>> @@ -168,8 +169,12 @@ static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> struct net_device *dev)
>> cb = XENVIF_RX_CB(skb);
>> cb->expires = jiffies + vif->drain_timeout;
>>
>> - xenvif_rx_queue_tail(queue, skb);
>> - xenvif_kick_thread(queue);
>> + if (!queue->vif->persistent_grants) {
>> + xenvif_rx_queue_tail(queue, skb);
>> + xenvif_kick_thread(queue);
>> + } else if (xenvif_rx_map(queue, skb)) {
>> + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
>> + }
>>
>
> We now have two different functions for guest RX, one is xenvif_rx_map,
> the other is xenvif_rx_action. They look very similar. Can we only have
> one?
I think I can merge this into xenvif_rx_action, and I notice that the stall
detection its missing. I will also add that.
Perhaps I could also disable the RX kthread, since this doesn't get used with
persistent grants?
>> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> index c4f57d7..228df92 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> @@ -883,9 +883,48 @@ static bool xenvif_rx_submit(struct xenvif_queue *queue,
>> return !!ret;
>> }
>>
>> +int xenvif_rx_map(struct xenvif_queue *queue, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + int ret = -EBUSY;
>> + struct netrx_pending_operations npo = {
>> + .copy = queue->grant_copy_op,
>> + .meta = queue->meta
>> + };
>> +
>> + if (!xenvif_rx_ring_slots_available(queue, XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX))
>
> I think you meant XEN_NETBK_RX_SLOTS_MAX?
Yes.
>> + goto done;
>> +
>> + xenvif_rx_build_gops(queue, &npo, skb);
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(npo.meta_prod > ARRAY_SIZE(queue->meta));
>> + if (!npo.copy_done && !npo.copy_prod)
>> + goto done;
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(npo.map_prod > MAX_GRANT_COPY_OPS);
>> + if (npo.map_prod) {
>> + ret = gnttab_map_refs(queue->rx_map_ops,
>> + NULL,
>> + queue->rx_pages_to_map,
>> + npo.map_prod);
>> + BUG_ON(ret);
>> + }
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(npo.copy_prod > MAX_GRANT_COPY_OPS);
>> + if (npo.copy_prod)
>> + gnttab_batch_copy(npo.copy, npo.copy_prod);
>> +
>> + if (xenvif_rx_submit(queue, &npo, skb))
>> + notify_remote_via_irq(queue->rx_irq);
>> +
>> + ret = 0; /* clear error */
>
> No need to have that comment.
>
>> +done:
>> + if (xenvif_queue_stopped(queue))
>> + xenvif_wake_queue(queue);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif_queue *queue)
>> {
>> - int ret;
>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>> struct sk_buff_head rxq;
>> bool need_to_notify = false;
>> @@ -905,22 +944,13 @@ static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif_queue
>> *queue)
>> }
>>
>> BUG_ON(npo.meta_prod > XEN_NETIF_RX_RING_SIZE);
>> - if (!npo.copy_done && !npo.copy_prod)
>> + if (!npo.copy_prod)
>
> You modified this line back and forth. You could just avoid modifying it
> in you previous patch to implement RX persistent grants.
>
>> return;
>>
>> BUG_ON(npo.copy_prod > MAX_GRANT_COPY_OPS);
>> if (npo.copy_prod)
>> gnttab_batch_copy(npo.copy, npo.copy_prod);
>>
>> - BUG_ON(npo.map_prod > MAX_GRANT_COPY_OPS);
>> - if (npo.map_prod) {
>> - ret = gnttab_map_refs(queue->rx_map_ops,
>> - NULL,
>> - queue->rx_pages_to_map,
>> - npo.map_prod);
>> - BUG_ON(ret);
>> - }
>> -
>
> And this? You delete the hunk you added in previous patch.
Having only one routine instead of adding xenvif_rx_map like you previously
suggested, solves moving this hunks around.
>
>> while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&rxq)) != NULL)
>> need_to_notify |= xenvif_rx_submit(queue, &npo, skb);
>>
>> --
>> 2.1.3
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |