[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 18/41] arm: Introduce a generic way to use a device from acpi
Hi Parth, On 25/05/2015 07:58, Parth Dixit wrote: On 24 May 2015 at 13:10, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 24/05/2015 08:06, Parth Dixit wrote:> +struct acpi_device_desc { > + /* Device name */ > + const char *name; > + /* Device class */ > + enum device_class class; > + /* type of device supported by the driver */ > + const int class_type; > + /* Device initialization */ > + int (*init)(const void *data); > +}; Given that the number of device will be minimal in Xen, I would prefer to merge this structure into device_desc by adding the ACPI fields. It would avoid to duplicate everything for only 2 fields changes. From the drivers point of view it would look like DEVICE_START(....) .dt_init = ... #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI .acpi_init = ... #endif DEVICE_END Or something like DEVICE_START(...) DT_INIT(...) ACPI_INIT(...) DEVICE_END And ACPI_INIT will be a no-op when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled. I think we agreed not to use common structure as it had some dt specific entries and there was scope of confusion.I don't remember a such agreement. So far, only compatible and init are DT specific. The rest (most of the fields) are device agnostic.Adding attachment of the previous discussion Thanks. Please a give link to the conversation (such as a mail archive) rather than an attachment. I had to look on the archive to find the context of this conversation... Also, that something useful to add in the notes of the patch (after ---). Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |