[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v10 6/9] Changes on test step of Debian hvm guest install
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 08:53 +0000, Pang, LongtaoX wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 9:56 PM > > To: Pang, LongtaoX > > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx; Hu, > > Robert > > Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v10 6/9] Changes on test step of Debian > > hvm > > guest install > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 11:36 +0800, longtao.pang wrote: > > > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ d-i partman-auto/expert_recipe string \\ > > > use_filesystem{ } filesystem{ vfat } \\ > > > mountpoint{ /boot/efi } \\ > > > . \\ > > > - 5000 50 5000 ext4 \\ > > > + 10000 50 10000 ext4 \\ > > > > These three numbers are > > > > <limits>::=<minimal size>_<priority>_<maximal size>_<parted fs> > > > > (from > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/tree/doc/devel/partman-a > > uto-recipe.txt) > > > > So here you are increasing the minimum size of the root partition for > > all debianhvm domains (including non-nested ones and L2 guests) from 5G > > to 10G. > > > > Did you test this with a normal L1 debianhvm guest (not one destined to > > be an L1 host). i.e. using test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 ? > > > > The new size you have given is the same size as the entire disk in that > > case. I'm not sure what will then happen... > > > > Perhaps "5000 50 -1 ext4" does what you need, namely leaves the minimum > > alone and sets the maximum to unlimited, which I think will end up > > making this partition as big as the disk less the configured swap space. > > > > Ian. > I have ever used 'Debian-7.6.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso' as debianhvm_image which is > 3.7G. > At that time, it's necessary to extend L1 guest's rootf size to '10000' to > store the image. > Currently, I use 'Debian-7.2.0-amd64-CD-1.iso' as debianhvm_image which is > just 624M, > the origin rootfs size of '5000' is sufficient to store this image and I have > tried that it works fine for nested job. > So, it's no need to extend guest's rootfs size anymore. OK, great, that should simplify things in the series. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |