[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] x86/intel_pstate: relocate the driver register/unregister function
>>> On 13.05.16 at 09:50, <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Register/unregister the CPU hotplug notifier when the driver is > registered, and move the driver register/unregister function to > the cpufreq.c. Without saying why I'm afraid I don't even see much reason to review this in any detail. > --- a/xen/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -630,12 +630,31 @@ static struct notifier_block cpu_nfb = { > .notifier_call = cpu_callback > }; > > -static int __init cpufreq_presmp_init(void) > +int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data) > { > - void *cpu = (void *)(long)smp_processor_id(); > - cpu_callback(&cpu_nfb, CPU_ONLINE, cpu); Why is this being removed without replacement? > + if (!driver_data || !driver_data->init > + || !driver_data->verify || !driver_data->exit > + || (!driver_data->target == !driver_data->setpolicy)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (cpufreq_driver) > + return -EBUSY; > + > + cpufreq_driver = driver_data; > + > register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb); > + > return 0; > } > -presmp_initcall(cpufreq_presmp_init); > > +int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver) > +{ > + if (!cpufreq_driver || (driver != cpufreq_driver)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + cpufreq_driver = NULL; > + > + unregister_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb); > + > + return 0; > +} This function is dead (and perhaps just like unregister_cpu_notifier() not even needed without loadable modules). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |