[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [osstest test] 57401: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

To: <robert.hu@xxxxxxxxx>, <longtaox.pang@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:26:01 +0100
Cc: ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:26:16 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 04:49 +0000, osstest service user wrote:
> flight 57401 osstest real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/57401/
> 
> Failures :-/ but no regressions.

Lontao, Robert,

The grub related bits of the nested series are now in the production
osstest instance.

I'm sorry but I've had a couple of high priority interrupts wrt
reviewing the remainder.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [osstest test] 57401: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
  - From: Robert Hu

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 8/8] xen/arm: make domain_max_vcpus return value according to vGIC version
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 0/5] Debian Jessie patches
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 0/8] Support more than 8 vcpus on arm64 with GICv3
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [osstest test] 57401: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.