Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/9] add xenalyze to staging

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 03/06/15 11:35, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 03/06/2015 11:10, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 08:24 +0000, Olaf Hering wrote:
>>> Having xenalyze in the source tree makes it much easier to keep private
>>> debug code in hypervisor and xenalyze in sync. It helped alot while
>>> debugging the root cause for commit
>>> 607e8494c42397fb249191904066cace6ac9a880.
>>
>> I'm afraid it doesn't build on arm64.
>>
>> Some of these actually look like non-arch specific failures (e.g.
>> conflicts with register_t from system headers) or issues which should
>> probably be addressed with xenalyze in tree (e.g. NR_CPUS ought to be
>> available directly now?) or with some trivial #ifdef modifications.
>>
>> That said, I don't know that xentrace actually works on ARM nor that
>> xenalyze could analyse such traces even with the build issues addressed,
>> so I'd be equally happy if this was just made x86 only.
>
> xentrace is not working as we don't have the infrastructure for ARM in
> Xen.
>
> Compiling xentrace & co only for x86 would be the more sensible solution.

Agreed, from the x86 side.  (It would also be nice for xentrace to gain
AMD support at some point.)

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel