Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv11 4/4] gnttab: use per-VCPU maptrack free lists

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/06/15 17:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 05.06.15 at 17:55, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 05/06/15 15:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 02.06.15 at 18:26, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> +    /*
>>>> +     * max_maptrack_frames is per domain so each VCPU gets a share of
>>>> +     * the maximum, but allow at least one frame per VCPU.
>>>> +     */
>>>> +    if ( v->maptrack_frames
>>>> +         && v->maptrack_frames >= max_maptrack_frames / 
>>>> v->domain->max_vcpus )
>>>> +        return -1;
>>>
>>> So with e.g. max_maptrack_frames being 256 and ->max_vcpus
>>> being 129 you'd potentially allow each vCPU to only have exactly
>>> one page despite there being 127 more to use.
>>
>> There's a limit to how many wacky combinations we can support with a
>> single default limit.
>>
>> With the standard defaults and 129 VCPUs:
>>
>> Before
>>
>> 131072 entries (256 * 4096 / 8)
>>
>> After
>>
>> 231168 entries (1024 / 129 * 129 * 4096 / 16)
>>   1792 entries per vcpu.
> 
> And that's why I'm putting the currently proposed resource
> management model under question.

The new default of 1024 frames ensures that with any number of VCPUs
results in the domain having /more/ entries than then old default (256
frames).

It's not at all clear what you want here.  Can you provide a proposal?

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel