Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 30/41] arm : acpi add placeholder for acpi load address

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Parth,

On 17/05/2015 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
> EFI table, memory description table and some of acpi tables
> will reside in DOM0 memory. Add placeholder for starting
> address for loading in DOM0 and get/set acpi size helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c    | 12 ++++++++++++
>   xen/arch/arm/kernel.c      |  5 ++++-
>   xen/arch/arm/kernel.h      |  1 +
>   xen/include/asm-arm/acpi.h |  4 ++++
>   4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
> index fd9bfa4..9b9f059 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>   #include <xen/acpi.h>
>   #include <asm/mm.h>
>
> +static int acpi_len = 0;
> +
There is no reason to type this variable signed int. Please use unsigned 
int.
Even better, paddr_t as you use like that after.

>   void __iomem *
>   acpi_os_map_iomem(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
>   {
> @@ -17,3 +19,13 @@ inline bool_t acpi_psci_hvc_present(void)
>   {
>       return acpi_gbl_FADT.arm_boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_PSCI_USE_HVC;
>   }
> +
> +inline int get_acpi_size(void)
> +{
> +    return acpi_len;
> +}
> +
> +inline void set_acpi_size(int size)
> +{
> +    acpi_len = size;
> +}
The variable name is misleading, acpi_len doesn't correspond to the real 
size of the ACPI but only whole size of the table generated by Xen.
Furthermore, based the usage I was able to find within the other patch, 
this variable is only used during dom0 creation and should live in kinfo.
--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel