[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86: drop is_pv_32on64_domain()

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:43:01 +0100
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:44:01 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 23/06/15 16:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_domain() after the x86-32
> removal.
>
> In a few cases this includes no longer open-coding is_pv_32bit_vcpu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] x86: further is_..._...() adjustments
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86: drop is_pv_32on64_domain()
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86: drop is_pv_32on64_vcpu()
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/mm: use is_..._vcpu() instead of open coding it
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86: drop is_pv_32on64_domain()
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86: drop is_pv_32on64_domain()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.