|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 06/12] VMX: add VMFUNC leaf 0 (EPTP switching) to emulator.
On 22/06/15 19:56, Ed White wrote:
> From: Ravi Sahita <ravi.sahita@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Sahita <ravi.sahita@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c | 8 ++++++++
> xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h | 4 ++++
> xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h | 2 ++
> 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> index ac9c9d6..e38a2fe 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> @@ -1356,6 +1356,13 @@ static int hvmemul_invlpg(
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static int hvmemul_vmfunc(
> + struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> +{
> + hvm_funcs.ahvm_vcpu_emulate_vmfunc(ctxt->regs);
> + return X86EMUL_OKAY;
> +}
ahvm_vcpu_emulate_vmfunc() should return an X86EMUL code.
> +
> static const struct x86_emulate_ops hvm_emulate_ops = {
> .read = hvmemul_read,
> .insn_fetch = hvmemul_insn_fetch,
> @@ -1379,7 +1386,8 @@ static const struct x86_emulate_ops hvm_emulate_ops = {
> .inject_sw_interrupt = hvmemul_inject_sw_interrupt,
> .get_fpu = hvmemul_get_fpu,
> .put_fpu = hvmemul_put_fpu,
> - .invlpg = hvmemul_invlpg
> + .invlpg = hvmemul_invlpg,
> + .vmfunc = hvmemul_vmfunc,
> };
>
> static const struct x86_emulate_ops hvm_emulate_ops_no_write = {
> @@ -1405,7 +1413,8 @@ static const struct x86_emulate_ops
> hvm_emulate_ops_no_write = {
> .inject_sw_interrupt = hvmemul_inject_sw_interrupt,
> .get_fpu = hvmemul_get_fpu,
> .put_fpu = hvmemul_put_fpu,
> - .invlpg = hvmemul_invlpg
> + .invlpg = hvmemul_invlpg,
> + .vmfunc = hvmemul_vmfunc,
> };
>
> static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt,
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index e8d9c82..ad9e9e4 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ static void vmx_fpu_dirty_intercept(void);
> static int vmx_msr_read_intercept(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *msr_content);
> static int vmx_msr_write_intercept(unsigned int msr, uint64_t msr_content);
> static void vmx_invlpg_intercept(unsigned long vaddr);
> +static int vmx_vmfunc_intercept(struct cpu_user_regs* regs);
s/* / */
>
> uint8_t __read_mostly posted_intr_vector;
>
> @@ -1826,6 +1827,20 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_update_vmfunc_ve(struct vcpu *v)
> vmx_vmcs_exit(v);
> }
>
> +static bool_t vmx_vcpu_emulate_vmfunc(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> +{
> + bool_t rc = 0;
> +
> + if ( !cpu_has_vmx_vmfunc && altp2mhvm_active(current->domain) &&
> + regs->eax == 0 &&
> + p2m_switch_vcpu_altp2m_by_id(current, (uint16_t)regs->ecx) )
Please latch current at the top of the function. It is inefficient to
access like this.
> + {
> + regs->eip += 3;
> + rc = 1;
> + }
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> static bool_t vmx_vcpu_emulate_ve(struct vcpu *v)
> {
> bool_t rc = 0;
> @@ -1894,6 +1909,7 @@ static struct hvm_function_table __initdata
> vmx_function_table = {
> .msr_read_intercept = vmx_msr_read_intercept,
> .msr_write_intercept = vmx_msr_write_intercept,
> .invlpg_intercept = vmx_invlpg_intercept,
> + .vmfunc_intercept = vmx_vmfunc_intercept,
> .handle_cd = vmx_handle_cd,
> .set_info_guest = vmx_set_info_guest,
> .set_rdtsc_exiting = vmx_set_rdtsc_exiting,
> @@ -1920,6 +1936,7 @@ static struct hvm_function_table __initdata
> vmx_function_table = {
> .ahvm_vcpu_update_eptp = vmx_vcpu_update_eptp,
> .ahvm_vcpu_update_vmfunc_ve = vmx_vcpu_update_vmfunc_ve,
> .ahvm_vcpu_emulate_ve = vmx_vcpu_emulate_ve,
> + .ahvm_vcpu_emulate_vmfunc = vmx_vcpu_emulate_vmfunc,
> };
>
> const struct hvm_function_table * __init start_vmx(void)
> @@ -2091,6 +2108,13 @@ static void vmx_invlpg_intercept(unsigned long vaddr)
> vpid_sync_vcpu_gva(curr, vaddr);
> }
>
> +static int vmx_vmfunc_intercept(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> +{
> + gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Failed guest VMFUNC execution\n");
> + domain_crash(current->domain);
> + return X86EMUL_OKAY;
> +}
> +
> static int vmx_cr_access(unsigned long exit_qualification)
> {
> struct vcpu *curr = current;
> @@ -2675,6 +2699,7 @@ void vmx_enter_realmode(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> regs->eflags |= (X86_EFLAGS_VM | X86_EFLAGS_IOPL);
> }
>
> +
Spurious whitespace change.
> static void vmx_vmexit_ud_intercept(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> {
> struct hvm_emulate_ctxt ctxt;
> @@ -3239,6 +3264,11 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> update_guest_eip();
> break;
>
> + case EXIT_REASON_VMFUNC:
> + if ( vmx_vmfunc_intercept(regs) == X86EMUL_OKAY )
This is currently an unconditional failure, and I don't see subsequent
patches which alter vmx_vmfunc_intercept(). Shouldn't
vmx_vmfunc_intercept() switch on eax and optionally call
p2m_switch_vcpu_altp2m_by_id()?
> + update_guest_eip();
> + break;
> +
> case EXIT_REASON_MWAIT_INSTRUCTION:
> case EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_INSTRUCTION:
> case EXIT_REASON_GETSEC:
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> index c017c69..4ae95ce 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> @@ -3837,6 +3837,14 @@ x86_emulate(
> goto rdtsc;
> }
>
> + if (modrm == 0xd4) /* vmfunc */
Style (spaces inside brackets).
~Andrew
> + {
> + fail_if(ops->vmfunc == NULL);
> + if ( (rc = ops->vmfunc(ctxt) != 0) )
> + goto done;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> switch ( modrm_reg & 7 )
> {
> case 0: /* sgdt */
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
> b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
> index 064b8f4..a4d4ec8 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
> @@ -397,6 +397,10 @@ struct x86_emulate_ops
> enum x86_segment seg,
> unsigned long offset,
> struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
> +
> + /* vmfunc: Emulate VMFUNC via given set of EAX ECX inputs */
> + int (*vmfunc)(
> + struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
> };
>
> struct cpu_user_regs;
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
> index 9cd674f..2e33b4f 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ struct hvm_function_table {
> int (*msr_read_intercept)(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *msr_content);
> int (*msr_write_intercept)(unsigned int msr, uint64_t msr_content);
> void (*invlpg_intercept)(unsigned long vaddr);
> + int (*vmfunc_intercept)(struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
> void (*handle_cd)(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long value);
> void (*set_info_guest)(struct vcpu *v);
> void (*set_rdtsc_exiting)(struct vcpu *v, bool_t);
> @@ -218,6 +219,7 @@ struct hvm_function_table {
> void (*ahvm_vcpu_update_eptp)(struct vcpu *v);
> void (*ahvm_vcpu_update_vmfunc_ve)(struct vcpu *v);
> bool_t (*ahvm_vcpu_emulate_ve)(struct vcpu *v);
> + bool_t (*ahvm_vcpu_emulate_vmfunc)(struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
> };
>
> extern struct hvm_function_table hvm_funcs;
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |