[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Migration bug added by commit 2df1aa01bef7366798248ac6d03cfb42048b003d
commit 2df1aa01bef7366798248ac6d03cfb42048b003d Author: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue Jun 23 18:07:49 2015 +0200 x86/hvm: remove hvm_io_pending() check in hvmemul_do_io() ... - rc = X86EMUL_RETRY; - if ( !hvm_send_assist_req(s, &p) ) + rc = hvm_send_assist_req(s, &p); + if ( rc != X86EMUL_RETRY ) ... if ( unlikely(!vcpu_start_shutdown_deferral(curr)) ) - return 0; /* implicitly bins the i/o operation */ + return X86EMUL_OKAY; So now X86EMUL_OKAY is returned from hvmemul_do_io() during shutdown. From Jan Beulich about this: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] hvmemul_do_io: If the send to the ioreq server failed do not retry. <https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&q=subject:%22Re%5C%3A+%5C%5BXen%5C-devel%5C%5D+%5C%5BPATCH+3%5C%2F5%5C%5D+hvmemul_do_io%5C%3A+If+the+send+to+the+ioreq+server+failed+do+not+retry.%22&o=newest>Jan Beulich <https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&q=from:%22Jan+Beulich%22> Fri, 30 Jan 2015 02:24:55 -0800 <https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&q=date:20150130> On 30.01.15 at 01:52, <dsl...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I.E. do just what no backing DM does. _If_ this is correct, the if() modified here should be folded with the one a few lines up. But looking at the description of the commit that introduced this (bac0999325 "x86 hvm: Do not incorrectly retire an instruction emulation...", almost immediately modified by f20f3c8ece "x86 hvm: On failed hvm_send_assist_req(), io emulation...") I doubt this is really what we want, or at the very least your change description should explain what was wrong with the original commit. Jan going up the call stack:in handle_pio when hvmemul_do_pio_buffer() returns X86EMUL_OKAY, it returns 1. svm_vmexit_handler 2578 if ( handle_pio(port, bytes, dir) ) or vmx_vmexit_handler 3178 if ( handle_pio(port, bytes, dir) ) both update the IP in this case which is wrong during shutdown. So I think: rc = hvm_send_assist_req(s, &p); if ( rc != X86EMUL_RETRY ) vio->io_state = HVMIO_none; needs to change to: rc = hvm_send_assist_req(s, &p); if ( rc != X86EMUL_RETRY ) { vio->io_state = HVMIO_none; if ( rc == X86EMUL_OKAY ) rc = X86EMUL_RETRY; } -Don Slutz _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |