Re: [Xen-devel] [v4][PATCH 11/19] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy

["Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx>]

> > > > Just let me rephrase this,
> > > >
> > > > "none" means we don't check any reserved regions and then all rdm
> > > > policies would be ignored, so guest just work as before.
> > > When or why would I write:
> > >          rdm = "none"
> > > in my configuration file instead of just not saying anything?
> > As you know we just have two options, "none" vs. "host". So we need a
> > explicit flag as a default libxl value to work out our mechanism.
> >
> > +libxl_rdm_reserve_type = Enumeration("rdm_reserve_type", [
> > +    (0, "none"),
> > +    (1, "host"),
> > +    ])
> > +
> >
> > We just think this name can make sense, right?
> What Ian was getting at was specifying type=none is the same as not
> specifying at all. So on *xl* level we can just expose "host" as the
Yes, but this is just a default value so user can set explicitly or 
don't specify anything in guest .cfg file, I think both cases should be 
allowed, shouldn't they?
Thanks
Tiejun

> only valid type.
>
> Ian, correct me if I misunderstand.
>
> Wei.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel