[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v3 11/15] Update IRTE according to guest interrupt config changes
On 24/06/15 06:18, Feng Wu wrote: > When guest changes its interrupt configuration (such as, vector, etc.) > for direct-assigned devices, we need to update the associated IRTE > with the new guest vector, so external interrupts from the assigned > devices can be injected to guests without VM-Exit. > > For lowest-priority interrupts, we use vector-hashing mechamisn to find > the destination vCPU. This follows the hardware behavior, since modern > Intel CPUs use vector hashing to handle the lowest-priority interrupt. > > For multicast/broadcast vCPU, we cannot handle it via interrupt posting, > still use interrupt remapping. > > Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > v3: > - Use bitmap to store the all the possible destination vCPUs of an > interrupt, then trying to find the right destination from the bitmap > - Typo and some small changes > > xen/drivers/passthrough/io.c | 96 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/io.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/io.c > index 9b77334..18e24e1 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/io.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/io.c > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > #include <asm/hvm/iommu.h> > #include <asm/hvm/support.h> > #include <xen/hvm/irq.h> > +#include <asm/io_apic.h> > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, dpci_list); > > @@ -199,6 +200,78 @@ void free_hvm_irq_dpci(struct hvm_irq_dpci *dpci) > xfree(dpci); > } > > +/* > + * The purpose of this routine is to find the right destination vCPU for > + * an interrupt which will be delivered by VT-d posted-interrupt. There > + * are several cases as below: > + * > + * - For lowest-priority interrupts, we find the destination vCPU from the > + * guest vector using vector-hashing mechanism and return true. This > follows > + * the hardware behavior, since modern Intel CPUs use vector hashing to > + * handle the lowest-priority interrupt. > + * - Otherwise, for single destination interrupt, it is straightforward to > + * find the destination vCPU and return true. > + * - For multicast/broadcast vCPU, we cannot handle it via interrupt posting, > + * so return false. s/false/NULL/ ? > + * > + * Here is the details about the vector-hashing mechanism: > + * 1. For lowest-priority interrupts, store all the possible destination > + * vCPUs in an array. > + * 2. Use "gvec % max number of destination vCPUs" to find the right > + * destination vCPU in the array for the lowest-priority interrupt. > + */ > +static struct vcpu *pi_find_dest_vcpu(struct domain *d, uint8_t dest_id, dest_id should clearly be 32bits rather than 8. > + uint8_t dest_mode, uint8_t > delivery_mode, > + uint8_t gvec) > +{ > + unsigned long *dest_vcpu_bitmap = NULL; > + unsigned int dest_vcpu_num = 0, idx = 0; > + int size = (d->max_vcpus + BITS_PER_LONG - 1) / BITS_PER_LONG; unsigned int, and "size" is far too generic of a name. > + struct vcpu *v, *dest = NULL; > + int i; Also unsigned. > + > + dest_vcpu_bitmap = xzalloc_array(unsigned long, size); > + if ( !dest_vcpu_bitmap ) > + { > + dprintk(XENLOG_G_INFO, > + "dom%d: failed to allocate memory\n", d->domain_id); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + for_each_vcpu ( d, v ) > + { > + if ( !vlapic_match_dest(vcpu_vlapic(v), NULL, 0, > + dest_id, dest_mode) ) > + continue; > + > + __set_bit(v->vcpu_id, dest_vcpu_bitmap); > + dest_vcpu_num++; > + } > + > + if ( delivery_mode == dest_LowestPrio ) > + { > + if ( dest_vcpu_num != 0 ) Too many spaces inside the brackets. > + { > + for ( i = 0; i <= gvec % dest_vcpu_num; i++) > + idx = find_next_bit(dest_vcpu_bitmap, d->max_vcpus, idx) + 1; > + idx--; > + > + BUG_ON(idx >= d->max_vcpus || idx < 0); > + dest = d->vcpu[idx]; > + } > + } > + else if ( dest_vcpu_num == 1 ) > + { > + idx = find_first_bit(dest_vcpu_bitmap, d->max_vcpus); > + BUG_ON(idx >= d->max_vcpus || idx < 0); find_first_bit() is unsigned, so can never be less than 0. > + dest = d->vcpu[idx]; > + } > + > + xfree(dest_vcpu_bitmap); > + > + return dest; > +} > + > int pt_irq_create_bind( > struct domain *d, xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq_t *pt_irq_bind) > { > @@ -257,7 +330,7 @@ int pt_irq_create_bind( > { > case PT_IRQ_TYPE_MSI: > { > - uint8_t dest, dest_mode; > + uint8_t dest, dest_mode, delivery_mode; > int dest_vcpu_id; > > if ( !(pirq_dpci->flags & HVM_IRQ_DPCI_MAPPED) ) > @@ -330,11 +403,32 @@ int pt_irq_create_bind( > /* Calculate dest_vcpu_id for MSI-type pirq migration. */ > dest = pirq_dpci->gmsi.gflags & VMSI_DEST_ID_MASK; > dest_mode = !!(pirq_dpci->gmsi.gflags & VMSI_DM_MASK); > + delivery_mode = (pirq_dpci->gmsi.gflags >> GFLAGS_SHIFT_DELIV_MODE) & > + VMSI_DELIV_MASK; > dest_vcpu_id = hvm_girq_dest_2_vcpu_id(d, dest, dest_mode); > pirq_dpci->gmsi.dest_vcpu_id = dest_vcpu_id; > spin_unlock(&d->event_lock); > if ( dest_vcpu_id >= 0 ) > hvm_migrate_pirqs(d->vcpu[dest_vcpu_id]); > + > + /* Use interrupt posting if it is supported */ > + if ( iommu_intpost ) > + { > + struct vcpu *vcpu = pi_find_dest_vcpu(d, dest, dest_mode, > + delivery_mode, pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec); > + > + if ( !vcpu ) > + dprintk(XENLOG_G_WARNING, > + "dom%u: failed to find the dest vCPU for PI, guest " > + "vector:0x%x use software way to deliver the " > + " interrupts.\n", d->domain_id, > pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec); If this is normal for a multicast interrupt, it must not be a WARNING level error message. It probably shouldn't even be a message at all. ~Andrew > + else if ( pi_update_irte( vcpu, info, pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec ) != > 0 ) > + dprintk(XENLOG_G_WARNING, > + "%pv: failed to update PI IRTE, guest vector:0x%x " > + "use software way to deliver the interrupts.\n", > + vcpu, pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec); > + } > + > break; > } > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |