[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: correct socket_cpumask allocation for AP



On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 04:38:52PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 08.07.15 at 17:11, <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 13:38 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 08.07.15 at 11:36, <chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > @@ -84,11 +85,21 @@ void *stack_base[NR_CPUS];
> >> >  static void smp_store_cpu_info(int id)
> >> >  {
> >> >      struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = cpu_data + id;
> >> > +    unsigned int socket;
> >> >  
> >> >      *c = boot_cpu_data;
> >> >      if ( id != 0 )
> >> > +    {
> >> >          identify_cpu(c);
> >> >  
> >> > +        socket = cpu_to_socket(id);
> >> > +        if ( !socket_cpumask[socket] )
> >> > +        {
> >> > +            socket_cpumask[socket] = secondary_socket_cpumask;
> >> > +            secondary_socket_cpumask = NULL;
> >> 
> >> I don't think this will build with small enough NR_CPUS.
> >>
> > And it *does* *not* fix the issue on my box.
> 
> I.e. bad analysis (albeit it seemed correct to me) _and_ new code
> not tested.

I did test it on my 2-sockets box, perhaps not covered all the cases.

> Chao, one more try, or we'll have to revert the whole
> series (closing the window for it for 4.6).

I honor this chance and certainly will try my best.

Thanks Jan.

Chao

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.