Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 1/4] pci: add PCI_SBDF and PCI_SEG macros

[Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:00:45PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 09.07.15 at 17:53, <elena.ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > ----- JBeulich@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >> >>> On 09.07.15 at 14:07, <elena.ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> > You are right, it needs to be rebased. I can post later rebased
> on
> > >> memory 
> > >> > leak fix version, if you thin its a way to go.
> > >> 
> > >> I didn't look at v9 yet, and can't predict when I will be able
> to.
> > > 
> > > Would you like me to post v10 with memory leak patch included in
> the 
> > > patchset before you start looking at v9?
> > 
> > If there is a dependency on the changes in the leak fix v6, then
> > this would be a good idea. If not, you can keep things as they are
> > now. I view the entire set more as a bug fix than a feature anyway,
> > and hence see no reason not to get this in after the freeze. But
> I'm
> > adding Wei just in case...
> > 
> 

Thanks Jan.
The dependency exists on memory leak patch, so I will add it to this series and 
squash the first patch from v9.
 
> I just looked at v9. The first three patches are quite mechanical.
> The
> fourth patch is relatively bigger but it's also quite straightforward
> (mostly parsing input). All in all, this series itself is
> self-contained.
> 
> I'm don't think OSSTest is able to test that, so it would not cause
> visible regression on our side.
> 
> I also agree it's a bug fix. Preferably this series should be applied
> before first RC.
> 
> Wei.

Thank you Wei.
> 
> > Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel