[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] PV-vNUMA issue: topology is misinterpreted by the guest

On 07/24/2015 12:39 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:

I don't say mangling cpuids can't solve the scheduling problem. It
surely can. But it can't solve the scheduling problem without hiding
information like number of sockets or cores which might be required
for license purposes. If we don't care, fine.

(this is somewhat repeating the email I just sent)

Why can's we construct socket/core info with CPUID (and *possibly* ACPI changes) that we present a reasonable (licensing-wise) picture?

Can you suggest an example where it will not work and then maybe we can figure something out?


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.