[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 06/18] vmx: Add some helper functions for Posted-Interrupts
>>> On 25.08.15 at 03:57, <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @@ -121,11 +122,31 @@ static inline int pi_test_and_clear_on(struct pi_desc > *pi_desc) > return test_and_clear_bit(POSTED_INTR_ON, &pi_desc->control); > } > > +static inline int pi_test_on(struct pi_desc *pi_desc) > +{ > + return test_bit(POSTED_INTR_ON, &pi_desc->control); > +} For this and ... > +static inline int pi_test_sn(struct pi_desc *pi_desc) > +{ > + return test_bit(POSTED_INTR_SN, &pi_desc->control); > +} ... this I wonder whether using the bitfield you defined in the previous patch wouldn't allow the compiler more freedom in how to carry this out. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |