[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Draft C] Boot ABI for HVM guests without a device-model
>>> On 04.09.15 at 17:47, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > VCPUOP_initialize was never available to HVM guests, so I don't think > changing the argument is a problem. However, I understand that for the > sake of clarity overloading an hypercall this way is not the best > practice. What about naming it VCPUOP_hvm_initialise? Hmm, don't know, the more that we want it primarily for PVH. > Would it make sense to add aliases to have: > > #define VCPU_hvm_up VCPU_up > #define VCPU_hvm_down VCPU_down > #define VCPU_hvm_is_up VCPU_is_up > > Just for symmetry reasons? If using the above, maybe. But I'd be afraid of this just becoming useless clutter. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |