[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for 4.6] configure: don't silently disable systemd support
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:04:10PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:54:16AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 23:35 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > Originally when user runs ./configure --enable-systemd and systemd > > > development library is not available the build system silently disables > > > systemd support. This is not in line with normal expectation. > > > > > > Instead, configure should error out when user has asked for systemd > > > support but development libraries can't be found. > > > > > > Reported-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Please rerun ./autogen.sh. > > > --- > > > m4/systemd.m4 | 6 +++++- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/m4/systemd.m4 b/m4/systemd.m4 > > > index 8284993..84508a1 100644 > > > --- a/m4/systemd.m4 > > > +++ b/m4/systemd.m4 > > > @@ -85,7 +85,11 @@ AC_DEFUN([AX_CHECK_SYSTEMD], [ > > > AC_DEFINE([HAVE_SYSTEMD], [1], [Systemd available and > > > enabled]) > > > systemd=y > > > AX_CHECK_SYSTEMD_LIBS() > > > - ],[systemd=n]) > > > + ],[ > > > +> > > AS_IF([test "x$enable_systemd" != "x"], > > > > At this point the value of enable_systemd is either empty or ...what...? I > > think "yes"?, with "no" having been ruled out earlier? > > > > Or can it be just "y"? > > > > At this point, it can't be no. It's either empty or "yes" (or "y"?). I For the record, it was "yes". _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |