[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/domctl: lower loglevel of XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping
Right, that's one of the things that would need taking care of. (Whether enforcing an upper limit is actually needed I'm not sure - we generally allow the admin to shoot himself in the foot if he wants to. And whether the lower limit should be 64 instead of just ensuring the limit is not zero is another question.)64 was semi-arbitrary - it ended up giving good latency on highly scalar machines (8 socket). Higher numbers ended up affecting the latency. But higher numbers on small socket machines were OK. (As they do not have 8 IOMMU VT-d chipsets all potentially flodding the QPI with serialized cache flushes). So we should make this range [8, <Its up to the user>] here, but 64 by default. Right? Thanks Tiejun _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |