[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm/xen: Enable user access to the kernel before issuing a privcmd call
On 11/09/15 15:29, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 15:16 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> When Xen is copyin data to/from the guest it will check if the kernel > > "copying" > >> has the right to do the access. If not, the hypercall will return an >> error. >> >> After the commit a5e090acbf545c0a3b04080f8a488b17ec41fe02 "ARM: >> software-based priviledged-no-access support", the kernel can't access > > "privileged" > >> anymore the user space by default. This will result to fail on every > > "any more" (or "any longer") > >> hypercall made by the userspace (i.e via privcmd). >> >> We have to enable the userspace access and then restore the correct >> permission everytime the privmcd is used to made an hypercall. > > "every time" and "privcmd" > >> HYPERCALL1(tmem_op); >> HYPERCALL2(multicall); >> >> -ENTRY(privcmd_call) >> +ENTRY(__privcmd_call) > > arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h seems to contain uaccess_* macros which > could be used right here directly I think? That would be preferable to > wrapping I think. Looking to the uaccess_save macro: .macro uaccess_save, tmp #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN mrc p15, 0, \tmp, c3, c0, 0 str \tmp, [sp, #S_FRAME_SIZE] #endif .endm It's saving the register on the Stack with an offset S_FRAME_SIZE. AFAICT, S_FRAME_SIZE is the size of the pt_regs structure. So it looks like to me that they are unusable for any assembly functions but entry point. I though about using a static inline for privcmd_call but it was introducing changes on the arm64 in order to decouple hypercall.h (it's common right now). Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |