[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
- To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx>, Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:23:43 +0100
- Cc: Jordan L Justen <jordan.l.justen@xxxxxxxxx>, edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gabriel L. Somlo \(GMail\)" <gsomlo@xxxxxxxxx>, Gary Ching-Pang Lin <glin@xxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Star Zeng <star.zeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:23:55 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 13:07 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Debian Wheezy is not very old, it's only a year older than RHEL7 (May
> > 2013
> > vs June 2014) and only a bit older than two years in absolute terms. It is
> > also the subject of an LTS effort, which extends its lifetime to 2018.
>
> (*)
>
> > For comparison Windows 7 (which you argue regressing would be serious) was
> > released in 2009 and there have been two major Windows releases since then.
>
> (**)
>
> > Given that and with consideration between the desire to run older platforms
> > vs. a development environment it seems to me that Debian Wheezy has not yet
> > reached the threshold for being ignored or for saying to users "you must
> > now upgrade".
>
> I believe I could argue against both (*) and (**), but it would not be
> productive. :)
Yes, I'm sure we could be here until the cows come home to roost ;-)
> Instead, what matters is the (now) clear, significant user demand for
> turning off PcdSetNxForStack by default. I'll send a followup patch for
> my series to that end.
Thanks.
> And, sorry about the inconvenience the regression may have caused, of
> course ;)
No need to apologise, it was an experiment worth performing IMHO.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
- References:
- [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
- Re: [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
- Re: [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
- Re: [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
- Re: [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
- Re: [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
- Re: [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
- Re: [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
- Re: [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
- Re: [Xen-devel] OVMF/Xen, Debian wheezy can't boot with NX on stack (Was: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg: prevent code execution from DXE stack)
|