[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 62022: regressions - FAIL
flight 62022 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62022/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs. 61513 Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-libvirt-vhd 14 guest-saverestore.2 fail in 61844 pass in 62022 test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 9 debian-install fail in 61844 pass in 62022 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 13 guest-localmigrate fail in 61844 pass in 62022 test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-start fail pass in 61844 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 13 guest-localmigrate fail pass in 61844 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 15 guest-localmigrate.2 fail pass in 61844 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs. 61513 test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail blocked in 61513 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair 21 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail in 61844 like 61513 test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 21 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail in 61844 like 61513 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail in 61844 like 61513 test-amd64-i386-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-install fail like 61513 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-install fail like 61513 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 61513 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 61513 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-migrupgrade 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd 11 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 9 debian-di-install fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-raw 9 debian-di-install fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 9 debian-di-install fail never pass build-amd64-prev 5 xen-build fail never pass build-i386-prev 5 xen-build fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-install fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 guest-saverestore fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-libvirt 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qcow2 11 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qcow2 11 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-libvirt-vhd 11 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-qcow2 9 debian-di-install fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass version targeted for testing: xen ffb4e6387f489b6b5ce287f51db43cb37ebae064 baseline version: xen ef89dc8c00087c8c1819e60bdad5527db70425e1 Last test of basis 61513 2015-09-07 11:42:18 Z 9 days Failing since 61751 2015-09-10 14:07:54 Z 6 days 3 attempts Testing same since 61844 2015-09-12 15:58:20 Z 4 days 2 attempts ------------------------------------------------------------ People who touched revisions under test: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@xxxxxxxxxx> Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx> Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx> Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> jobs: build-amd64 pass build-armhf pass build-i386 pass build-amd64-libvirt pass build-armhf-libvirt pass build-i386-libvirt pass build-amd64-prev fail build-i386-prev fail build-amd64-pvops pass build-armhf-pvops pass build-i386-pvops pass build-amd64-rumpuserxen pass build-i386-rumpuserxen pass test-amd64-amd64-xl pass test-armhf-armhf-xl pass test-amd64-i386-xl pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd fail test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck pass test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 pass test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel fail test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt fail test-amd64-i386-libvirt pass test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade blocked test-amd64-i386-migrupgrade blocked test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu pass test-amd64-amd64-pair pass test-amd64-i386-pair pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair pass test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair pass test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub pass test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub pass test-amd64-amd64-pygrub pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qcow2 pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 fail test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qcow2 pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 fail test-armhf-armhf-xl-qcow2 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2 pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-raw fail test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw fail test-amd64-i386-libvirt-raw fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-raw pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-raw fail test-amd64-i386-xl-raw pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds fail test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd fail test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-vhd fail test-amd64-i386-libvirt-vhd pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-vhd pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd fail test-amd64-i386-xl-vhd fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 pass ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org logs: /home/logs/logs images: /home/logs/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary Not pushing. ------------------------------------------------------------ commit ffb4e6387f489b6b5ce287f51db43cb37ebae064 Author: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue Jul 14 17:41:10 2015 +0100 xl: correct handling of extra_config in main_cpupoolcreate Don't dereference extra_config if it's NULL. Don't leak extra_config in the end. Also fixed a typo in error string while I was there. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (cherry picked from commit 705c9e12426cba82804cb578fc70785281655d94) commit 2049db36021e305510adc09c8388208c784c7522 Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Sep 11 11:51:59 2015 +0100 QEMU_TAG update commit 0b6e02bd3b589c50d3d8111e91b9510d226e7e40 Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Sep 10 15:36:12 2015 +0200 x86/NUMA: make init_node_heap() respect Xen heap limit On NUMA systems, where we try to use node local memory for the basic control structures of the buddy allocator, this special case needs to take into consideration a possible address width limit placed on the Xen heap. In turn this (but also other, more abstract considerations) requires that xenheap_max_mfn() not be called more than once (at most we might permit it to be called a second time with a larger value than was passed the first time), and be called only before calling end_boot_allocator(). While inspecting all the involved code, a couple of off-by-one issues were found (and are being corrected here at once): - arch_init_memory() cleared one too many page table slots - the highmem_start based invocation of xenheap_max_mfn() passed too big a value - xenheap_max_mfn() calculated the wrong bit count in edge cases Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> xen/arm64: do not (incorrectly) limit size of xenheap The commit 88e3ed61642bb393458acc7a9bd2f96edc337190 "x86/NUMA: make init_node_heap() respect Xen heap limit" breaks boot on the arm64 board X-Gene. The xenheap bits variable is used to know the last RAM MFN always mapped in Xen virtual memory. If the value is 0, it means that all the memory is always mapped in Xen virtual memory. On X-gene the RAM bank resides above 128GB and last xenheap MFN is 0x4400000. With the new way to calculate the number of bits, xenheap_bits will be equal to 38 bits. This will result to hide all the RAM and the impossibility to allocate xenheap memory. Given that aarch64 have always all the memory mapped in Xen virtual memory, it's not necessary to call xenheap_max_mfn which set the number of bits. Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> master commit: 88e3ed61642bb393458acc7a9bd2f96edc337190 master date: 2015-09-01 14:02:57 +0200 master commit: 0a7167d9b20cdc48e6ea320fbbb920b3267c9757 master date: 2015-09-04 14:58:07 +0100 commit ef372ac6ec1619491bb194c841d1b7405554a1c9 Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Sep 10 15:35:11 2015 +0200 x86/NUMA: don't account hotplug regions ... except in cases where they really matter: node_memblk_range[] now is the only place all regions get stored. nodes[] and NODE_DATA() track present memory only. This improves the reporting when nodes have disjoint "normal" and hotplug regions, with the hotplug region sitting above the highest populated page. In such cases a node's spanned-pages value (visible in both XEN_SYSCTL_numainfo and 'u' debug key output) covered all the way up to top of populated memory, giving quite different a picture from what an otherwise identically configured system without and hotplug regions would report. Note, however, that the actual hotplug case (as well as cases of nodes with multiple disjoint present regions) is still not being handled such that the reported values would represent how much memory a node really has (but that can be considered intentional). Reported-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx> This at once makes nodes_cover_memory() no longer consider E820_RAM regions covered by SRAT hotplug regions. Also reject self-overlaps with mismatching hotplug flags. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx> master commit: c011f470e6e79208f5baa071b4d072b78c88e2ba master date: 2015-08-31 13:52:24 +0200 commit 8bdfe147851d7b73f41613966ba6fc8659d6a5b9 Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Sep 10 15:34:26 2015 +0200 x86/NUMA: fix setup_node() The function referenced an __initdata object (nodes_found). Since this being a node mask was more complicated than needed, the variable gets replaced by a simple counter. Check at once that the count of nodes doesn't go beyond MAX_NUMNODES. Also consolidate three printk()s related to the function's use into just one. Finally (quite the opposite of the above issue) __init-annotate nodes_cover_memory(). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> master commit: 8f945d36d9bddd5b589ba23c7322b30d623dd084 master date: 2015-08-31 13:51:52 +0200 commit 8933ed433693bff92e5f7c760bffcfff6a92614d Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Sep 10 15:33:45 2015 +0200 IOMMU: skip domains without page tables when dumping Reported-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> master commit: 5f335544cf5b716b0af51223e33373c4a7d65e8c master date: 2015-08-27 17:40:38 +0200 commit d46192366df9951378ddd4457311729cfd0668ca Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Sep 10 15:33:12 2015 +0200 x86/IO-APIC: don't create pIRQ mapping from masked RTE While moving our XenoLinux patches to 4.2-rc I noticed bogus "already mapped" messages resulting from Linux (legitimately) writing RTEs with only the mask bit set. Clearly we shouldn't even attempt to create a pIRQ <-> IRQ mapping from such RTEs. In the course of this I also found that the respective message isn't really useful without also printing the pre-existing mapping. And I noticed that map_domain_pirq() allowed IRQ0 to get through, despite us never allowing a domain to control that interrupt. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> master commit: 669d4b85c433674ab3b52ef707af0d3a551c941f master date: 2015-08-25 16:18:31 +0200 commit 5b7198822921e0c8a9c2ff140e3fe52a1b974844 Author: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu Sep 10 15:32:13 2015 +0200 x86, amd_ucode: skip microcode updates for final levels Some of older[Fam10h] systems require that certain number of applied microcode patch levels should not be overwritten by the microcode loader. Otherwise, system hangs are known to occur. The 'final_levels' of patch ids have been obtained empirically. Refer bug https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913996 for details of the issue. The short version is that people have predominantly noticed system hang issues when trying to update microcode levels beyond the patch IDs below. [0x01000098, 0x0100009f, 0x010000af] From internal discussions, we gathered that OS/hypervisor cannot reliably perform microcode updates beyond these levels due to hardware issues. Therefore, we need to abort microcode update process if we hit any of these levels. In this patch, we check for those microcode versions and abort if the current core has one of those final patch levels applied by the BIOS A linux version of the patch has already made it into tip- http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=143703405627170 Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> master commit: 22c5675877c8209adcfdb6bceddb561320374529 master date: 2015-08-25 16:17:13 +0200 commit fabd2cffef1eaf94159b941edb1dc05c8cf20597 Author: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Sep 10 15:31:30 2015 +0200 mm: populate_physmap: validate correctly the gfn for direct mapped domain Direct mapped domain has already the memory allocated 1:1, so we are directly using the gfn as mfn to map the RAM in the guest. While we are validating that the page associated to the first mfn belongs to the domain, the subsequent MFN are not validated when the extent_order is > 0. This may result to map memory region (MMIO, RAM) which doesn't belong to the domain. Although, only DOM0 on ARM is using a direct memory mapped. So it doesn't affect any guest (at least on the upstream version) or even x86. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> master commit: 9503ab0e9c6a41a1ee7a70c8ea9313d08ebaa8c5 master date: 2015-08-13 14:41:09 +0200 commit 9e6379ed39a53870a749230410ed9cfdd88348cf Author: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Sep 10 15:30:36 2015 +0200 x86/mm: Make {hap, shadow}_teardown() preemptible A domain with sufficient shadow allocation can cause a watchdog timeout during domain destruction. Expand the existing -ERESTART logic in paging_teardown() to allow {hap/sh}_set_allocation() to become restartable during the DOMCTL_destroydomain hypercall. Signed-off-by: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> master commit: 0174da5b79752e2d5d6ca0faed89536e8f3d91c7 master date: 2015-08-06 10:04:43 +0100 commit 12afed3c90a3f56cd3b6376992cfcb849aa8f3f9 Author: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Sep 10 15:29:31 2015 +0200 x86/gdt: Drop write-only, xalloc()'d array from set_gdt() It is not used, and can cause a spurious failure of the set_gdt() hypercall in low memory situations. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> master commit: a7bd9b1661304500cd18b7d216d616ecf053ebdb master date: 2015-08-05 10:32:45 +0100 (qemu changes not included) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |