[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 62028: regressions - FAIL
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 04:15:37PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 13:44 +0000, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 62028 qemu-mainline real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62028/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > > 61666 > > test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > > 61666 > > test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > > 61666 > [...many more for every test-*...] > > I looked at test-*-*-xl and they all seem to have hung at "Starting QEMU as > disk backend for dom0". > > In this flight http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62028/test- > amd64-amd64-xl/serial-chardonnay1.log ends with: > > Sep 17 11:58:48.589051 Starting QEMU as disk backend for dom0 > Sep 17 11:58:48.589081 > Sep 17 11:59:41.890612 <client 0x93c470 connected - now 1 clients> > (the new client is going to hit the debug keys after the timeout) > > By comparison 61666 has in http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs > /61666/test-amd64-amd64-xl/serial-elbling0.log > > Sep 10 13:31:52.273142 Starting QEMU as disk backend for dom0 > Sep 10 13:31:52.273183 Starting NTP server: ntpd. > Sep 10 13:32:18.613286 [r[H[J > > Sep 10 13:32:18.652996 Debian GNU/Linux 7 elbling0 hvc0 > > i.e. normally dom0's qemu starts almost instantly. > > Given the number of failures here this seems unlikely to be host specific > and almost certain represents a bug in qemu-mainline. > > It was noted on xen-users this morning that there is no logging from this > qemu instance -- fixing that would be well worthwhile I think. I don't think there is anything to do on systems using systemd, we can find the stdout and stderr in the system logs. What does debian with the stdout and stderr of a service? > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62028/test-amd64-amd64-xl/chardonnay1-output-ps_wwwaxf_-eo_pid%2Ctty%2Cstat%2Ctime%2Cnice%2Cpsr%2Cpcpu%2Cpmem%2Cnwchan%2Cwchan%2325%2Cargs > > shows the process: > > 3638 ? SL 00:00:00 0 3 0.3 0.5 1d1054 poll_schedule_timeout > \_ startpar -p 4 -t 20 -T 3 -M start -P N -R 2 > 3815 ? S 00:00:00 0 0 0.0 0.3 b0482 wait > \_ /bin/bash /etc/init.d/xencommons start > 4053 ? Sl 00:00:00 0 1 0.0 1.6 ffffff pipe_wait > \_ /usr/local/lib/xen/bin/qemu-system-i386 -xen-domid 0 > -xen-attach -name dom0 -nographic -M xenpv -daemonize -monitor /dev/null > -serial /dev/null -parallel /dev/null -pidfile /var/run/qemu-dom0.pid > 4171 ? Ss 00:00:00 0 2 0.0 0.5 113cd9 futex_wait_queue_me > \_ /usr/local/lib/xen/bin/qemu-system-i386 -xen-domid 0 > -xen-attach -name dom0 -nographic -M xenpv -daemonize -monitor /dev/null > -serial /dev/null -parallel /dev/null -pidfile /var/run/qemu-dom0.pid > > The bisector seems to have started working on this in http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/qemu-mainline/test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd.xen-boot.html I found the first commit that have the same behavior: commit 5243722376873a48e9852a58b91f4d4101ee66e4 rcu: init rcu_registry_lock after fork -- Anthony PERARD _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |