Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 62047: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.09.15 at 08:53, <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 62047 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62047/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-raw        9 debian-di-install         fail REGR. vs. 
> 60727
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2      9 debian-di-install         fail REGR. vs. 
> 60727

Is there a reason why various other debian-di-install tests are
in the allowable regressions section below, but not these two? I
remember having looked at such failures before, without it
really becoming clear to me what is going wrong there.

> Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
>  test-amd64-i386-libvirt-vhd   9 debian-di-install         fail REGR. vs. 
> 60727
>  test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd  9 debian-di-install         fail REGR. vs. 
> 60727
>  test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-raw  9 debian-di-install         fail REGR. vs. 
> 60727
>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start/debian.repeat    fail  like 
> 60696
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-vhd        9 debian-di-install            fail   like 
> 60727
>  test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qcow2  9 debian-di-install            fail  like 
> 60727
>  test-amd64-i386-libvirt      11 guest-start                  fail   like 
> 60727
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-vhd       9 debian-di-install            fail   like 
> 60727
>  test-amd64-amd64-libvirt     11 guest-start                  fail   like 
> 60727
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop             fail like 
> 60727

Thanks, Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel