Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling domain hierarchy

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/22/2015 05:42 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> One other thing I just discovered: there are other consumers of the
> topology sibling masks (e.g. topology_sibling_cpumask()) as well.
> 
> I think we would want to avoid any optimizations based on those in
> drivers as well, not only in the scheduler.

I'm beginning to lose the thread of the discussion here a bit.

Juergen / Dario, could one of you summarize your two approaches, and the
(alleged) advantages and disadvantages of each one?

Thanks,
 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel