[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/8] xen/arm: Fix comment coding style in handle_node in domain_build.c



On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:47 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Only coding style changes. No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked + applied since it was so trivial and standalone.

> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> index f7ea240..651d75e 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> @@ -1226,8 +1226,10 @@ static int handle_node(struct domain *d, struct
> kernel_info *kinfo,
>          return 0;
>      }
>  
> -    /* Replace these nodes with our own. Note that the original may be
> -     * used_by DOMID_XEN so this check comes first. */
> +    /*
> +     * Replace these nodes with our own. Note that the original may be
> +     * used_by DOMID_XEN so this check comes first.
> +     */
>      if ( device_get_class(node) == DEVICE_GIC )
>          return make_gic_node(d, kinfo->fdt, node);
>      if ( dt_match_node(timer_matches, node) )
> @@ -1240,7 +1242,8 @@ static int handle_node(struct domain *d, struct
> kernel_info *kinfo,
>          return 0;
>      }
>  
> -    /* Even if the IOMMU device is not used by Xen, it should not be
> +    /*
> +     * Even if the IOMMU device is not used by Xen, it should not be
>       * passthrough to DOM0
>       */
>      if ( device_get_class(node) == DEVICE_IOMMU )

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.