[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/8] xen/arm: Fix comment coding style in handle_node in domain_build.c
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:47 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Only coding style changes. No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked + applied since it was so trivial and standalone. > --- > xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > index f7ea240..651d75e 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > @@ -1226,8 +1226,10 @@ static int handle_node(struct domain *d, struct > kernel_info *kinfo, > return 0; > } > > - /* Replace these nodes with our own. Note that the original may be > - * used_by DOMID_XEN so this check comes first. */ > + /* > + * Replace these nodes with our own. Note that the original may be > + * used_by DOMID_XEN so this check comes first. > + */ > if ( device_get_class(node) == DEVICE_GIC ) > return make_gic_node(d, kinfo->fdt, node); > if ( dt_match_node(timer_matches, node) ) > @@ -1240,7 +1242,8 @@ static int handle_node(struct domain *d, struct > kernel_info *kinfo, > return 0; > } > > - /* Even if the IOMMU device is not used by Xen, it should not be > + /* > + * Even if the IOMMU device is not used by Xen, it should not be > * passthrough to DOM0 > */ > if ( device_get_class(node) == DEVICE_IOMMU ) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |