[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/pvhvm: add soft reset on kexec/kdump support
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 09/25/2015 03:35 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:19:57PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>> On 09/25/2015 03:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>>>> On 09/25/2015 12:07 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >>>>>>> Also, I am not sure I see how this new op will be used in the >>>>>>> hypervisor --- currently AFAICS it is only processed under >>>>>>> is_hardware_domain(). Are there other patches that will support HVM >>>>>>> guests? >>>>>> Please see my Xen series: >>>>>> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-09/msg00547.html >>>>>> (last 'full' submission). >>>>>> >>>>>> All patches from my 'toolstack-assisted approach to PVHVM guest kexec' >>>>>> are already merged to xen.git (first 10 are already in 'master' and the >>>>>> last one is in 'staging'). >>>>>> >>>>> OK, so I was looking at the right tree. Then I don't understand how >>>>> SHUTDOWN_soft_reset would be reached for a non-privileged domain. The only >>>>> path that I see is >>>>> >>>>> domain_shutdown() >>>>> { >>>>> ... >>>>> if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) >>>>> hwdom_shutdown(reason); >>>>> ... >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> Is there another path to handle this op? >>>> Yes: >>>> e1bd9812966de9a16f30a58e7162b80bd6af361b libxc: support >>>> XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset operation >>>> and >>>> c57e6ebd8c3e490e353e68d96abec1dad01e72f5 (lib)xl: soft reset support >>>> >>> >>> That's toolstack issuing hypercalls from dom0. >>> >>> I am asking about (non-privileged) guest itself calling SCHEDOP_shutdown. >> The hypervisor ends up calling: >> __domain_finalise_shutdown which sends an VIRQ_DOM_EXC to dom0 which >> makes the toolstack do all of those operations. > > OK. But the I don't see anyone checking that 'reason' (or > 'shutdown_code') is SHUTDOWN_soft_reset. In other words, the guest can > do 'xen_reboot(23)' or 'xen_reboot(154)'. Or, it seems, even > 'xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_reboot)'? The only value it shouldn't be is > SHUTDOWN_suspend. Xen hypervisor doesn't analyzie the reason, it is being analyzed by the toolstack (XEN_DOMCTL_getdomaininfo returns this info encoded in flags with XEN_DOMINF_shutdownshift shift). -- Vitaly _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |