Re: [Xen-devel] Survey Results - Part 1 : Improving Xen Project Governance and Conventions

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 06.10.15 at 12:26, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now arguably any maintainer of a piece of libxl ought to be familiar with
> all of that. But, personally I don't think that is very reasonable either
> as a burden for those feature maintainers or particularly as a strategy for
> ensuring the library remains coherent.

Agreed. But rather than always requiring multiple acks, wouldn't it be
more reasonable for the "small" maintainer to explicitly request an ack
from the "large" one in such cases?

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel