Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Use vAPIC when doing IPI for PVHVM guests.

[Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>]

On 10/07/2015 10:21 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I was running some tools in which we would heavily do rescheduling
> of events - and realized to my surprise that the event channels (and
> the hypercall) would slow things down. If I used the vAPIC with its
> IPI support (so no VMEXIT) I got much much better performance.
>
> Now this is an RFC because:
>   1). I hadn't verified from the xentrace  how much less VMEXITS we get.
>      But I remember Boris's patches and they gave at least 10%.
>      I think this will get the same performance or even better.
>
>   2). I don't know what to do with migration. That is if the guest
>      migrates to older hardware it needs to recheck this I presume?
Same problem applies to many other features. In case you want to
migrate to a machine with less features you'd have to mask those
features in the cpuid data of the domain.

>   3). Should this be enabled by default? I did get better performance
>     but that was synthetic.
Having some benchmark results would help to decide this. :-)

I'd be especially interested in checking "no vcpu over-commitment"
and "heavy vcpu over-commitment" scenarios regarding the effect of
the feature.

> Thoughts?
I like the idea.


Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel