[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] x86: remove unused x87 remnants of 32-bit days
On 14/10/15 14:29, Jan Beulich wrote: > x86-64 requires FXSR, XMM, and XMM2, so there's no point in hiding > respective code behind conditionals. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, with two suggestions. > --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c > @@ -1295,10 +1295,8 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigne > > identify_cpu(&boot_cpu_data); > > - if ( cpu_has_fxsr ) > - set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_OSFXSR); > - if ( cpu_has_xmm ) > - set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_OSXMMEXCPT); > + set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_OSFXSR); > + set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_OSXMMEXCPT); set_in_cr4() takes a mask, so could take both of these at once, to be slightly more efficient. If the bsp path gained an unconditional write_cr4(mmu_cr4_features) then it might be better to fold them into the initialiser for mmu_cr4_features. > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/page.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/page.h > @@ -206,13 +206,10 @@ typedef struct { u64 pfn; } pagetable_t; > #define pagetable_null() pagetable_from_pfn(0) > > void clear_page_sse2(void *); > -#define clear_page(_p) (cpu_has_xmm2 ? \ > - clear_page_sse2((void *)(_p)) : \ > - (void)memset((void *)(_p), 0, PAGE_SIZE)) > void copy_page_sse2(void *, const void *); > -#define copy_page(_t,_f) (cpu_has_xmm2 ? \ > - copy_page_sse2(_t, _f) : \ > - (void)memcpy(_t, _f, PAGE_SIZE)) > + > +#define clear_page(_p) clear_page_sse2(_p) > +#define copy_page(_t,_f) copy_page_sse2(_t, _f) As you are changing this, an extra space following the comma. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |