[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 7/9] xen/blkback: separate ring information out of struct xen_blkif
On 10/19/2015 05:36 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > El 10/10/15 a les 6.08, Bob Liu ha escrit: >> On 10/05/2015 10:55 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> The same for the pool of persistent grants, it should be per-device and >>> not per-ring. >>> >>> And I think this issue is far worse than the others, because a frontend >>> might use a persistent grant on different queues, forcing the backend >>> map the grant several times for each queue, this is not acceptable IMO. >>> >> >> Hi Roger, >> >> I realize it would make things complicate if making persistent grant >> per-device instead of per-queue. >> Extra locks are required to protect the per-device pool on both blkfront and >> blkback. > > Yes, I realize this, but without having at least a prototype it's hard > to tell if contention is going to be a problem or not. We already use a > red-black tree to store persistent grants, which should be quite fast > when performing searches. > > IMHO, we are doing things backwards, we should have investigated first > if using per-device was a problem, and if it indeed was a problem then > move to per-queue. Using per-device just required adding locks around > the functions to get/put grants and friends, leaving the data structures > untouched (per-device). > >> AFAIR, there was a discussion before about dropping persistent grant map at >> all. >> The only reason we left this feature was backward compatibility. >> So that I think we should not complicate xen-block code any more because of >> a going to be dropped feature. >> >> How about disable feature-persistent if multi-queue was used? > > This is not what we have done in the past, also there's no way for > blkback to tell the frontend that persistent grants and multiqueue > cannot be used at the same time. Blkback puts all supported features on > xenstore before knowing anything about the frontend. > > Also, if you want to do it per-queue instead of per-device the limits > need to be properly adjusted, not just the persistent grants one, but > also the queue of cached free pages. This also implies that each queue > it's going to have it's own LRU and purge task. > Okay, then I'll update with a per-device version. For blkfront there would be two locks used, one for per-device and the other for per-ring. For blkback, an new lock would be added to protect the red-black tree e.g. in add_persistent_gnt(). -- Regards, -Bob _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |