Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete 
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm"):
> I'm now confident that the bisector is doing the right thing. I dig into
> various flights to understand what the long list of flights actually
> meant. It might be helpful we have page explaining how to interpret this
> email, too.

You mean the stuff at the end of the "bisection complete" mail ?

That's output mostly useful for debugging osstest, I think.  It's
provided there in case the revision graph web page is not suitable for
your purposes; for example, so that you can c&p more easily, or for
when you don't want to feed your browser a massive image.

But you're right that a document explaining the meaning of bisection
results is probably helpful.

> In a previous reply I said I was confused because the flight that got a
> push (63026) had test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm run on
> italia*, not merlot*, so I wasn't sure if OSSTest was doing the right
> thing.  But then I looked again, the aforementioned test case did get a
> pass on merlot* in 63024. So in 63026 OSSTest worked out the tree was
> fine.

I don't remember, and my MUA can't find, this mail of yours, but OK,
good, thanks.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel