[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/13] x86/hvm: Setup TSC scaling ratio
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:31:11AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 23.10.15 at 10:18, <haozhong.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:59:46AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 23.10.15 at 09:44, <haozhong.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:13:07AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >> >>> On 28.09.15 at 09:13, <haozhong.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Please remember to trim your replies. > >> > >> >> > @@ -2023,6 +2051,9 @@ static int hvm_load_cpu_ctxt(struct domain *d, > > hvm_domain_context_t *h) > >> >> > if ( hvm_funcs.load_cpu_ctxt(v, &ctxt) < 0 ) > >> >> > return -EINVAL; > >> >> > > >> >> > + if ( !v->domain->arch.vtsc && hvm_funcs.tsc_scaling_supported ) > >> >> > + hvm_setup_tsc_scaling(v); > >> >> > >> >> What's the rationale for putting it in this function? > >> > > >> > hvm_load_cpu_ctxt() is called in the migration to restore vcpu's state > >> > including TSC related things, so hvm_setup_tsc_scaling() is called > >> > here. > >> > > >> > hvm_vcpu_reset_state() is not called in the migration, so we cannot > >> > rely on the call to hvm_setup_tsc_scaling() there. > >> > >> All that is understood, but doesn't explain why the scaling setup gets > >> done here instead of somewhere after _all_ state got loaded. > > > > Because vcpu is waken up at the end of hvm_vcpu_reset_state(), the > > setup of TSC scaling should be done before that. > > But we're talking about hvm_load_cpu_ctxt() here. > Sorry for the typo. s/hvm_vcpu_reset_state/hvm_load_cpu_ctxt > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |