[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xl: convert cpupool related return codes to EXIT_[SUCCESS|FAILURE]
And here we are at the last patch of this series. Allow me to say that this is quite good a first contribution! Thanks for this, and I'm looking forward to seeing version 2!! :-D About this patch, a few comments below. On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 13:18 +0530, Harmandeep Kaur wrote: > turning cpupools related functions xl exit codes towards using the > EXIT_[SUCCESS|FAILURE] macros, instead of instead of arbitrary > numbers > or libxl return codes. > > Signed-off-by: Harmandeep Kaur <write.harmandeep@xxxxxxxxx> > --- a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c > +++ b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c > @@ -7497,7 +7497,7 @@ out: > free(name); > free(config_data); > free(extra_config); > - return rc; > + return rc ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS; > } > I think you can just initialize rc with EXIT_FAILURE, assign EXIT_SUCCESS to it near the end, if everything went ok, and then keep the 'return rc'; > int main_cpupooldestroy(int argc, char **argv) > @@ -7580,13 +7580,13 @@ int main_cpupooldestroy(int argc, char > **argv) > if (libxl_cpupool_qualifier_to_cpupoolid(ctx, pool, &poolid, > NULL) || > !libxl_cpupoolid_is_valid(ctx, poolid)) { > fprintf(stderr, "unknown cpupool '%s'\n", pool); > - return 1; > + return EXIT_FAILURE; > } > > if (libxl_cpupool_destroy(ctx, poolid)) > - return 1; > + return EXIT_FAILURE; > > - return 0; > + return EXIT_SUCCESS; > } > For this one: I've sent a patch for another reason yesterday, and while there I did the exit code adjustment myself. So, update your tree and, if my patch has been committed already, just skip this function. https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg42850.html Which brings up a question: what git tree are you using for development? You should stay either on master or staging branches (and I recommend staging) of the official repository: http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Repositories > @@ -7653,7 +7653,7 @@ int main_cpupoolcpuadd(int argc, char **argv) > > out: > libxl_bitmap_dispose(&cpumap); > - return rc; > + return rc ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS; > Same as already said for main_cpupoolcreate, just us rc. > @@ -7691,7 +7691,7 @@ int main_cpupoolcpuremove(int argc, char > **argv) > > out: > libxl_bitmap_dispose(&cpumap); > - return rc; > + return rc ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS; > And here. > int main_cpupoolnumasplit(int argc, char **argv) > @@ -7758,7 +7758,7 @@ int main_cpupoolnumasplit(int argc, char > **argv) > poolinfo = libxl_list_cpupool(ctx, &n_pools); > if (!poolinfo) { > fprintf(stderr, "error getting cpupool info\n"); > - return 1; > + return EXIT_FAILURE; > } > poolid = poolinfo[0].poolid; > sched = poolinfo[0].sched; > @@ -7766,13 +7766,13 @@ int main_cpupoolnumasplit(int argc, char > **argv) > > if (n_pools > 1) { > fprintf(stderr, "splitting not possible, already cpupools in > use\n"); > - return 1; > + return EXIT_FAILURE; > } > > topology = libxl_get_cpu_topology(ctx, &n_cpus); > if (topology == NULL) { > fprintf(stderr, "libxl_get_topologyinfo failed\n"); > - return 1; > + return EXIT_FAILURE; > } > > if (libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap, 0)) { > @@ -7869,7 +7869,7 @@ out: > libxl_dominfo_dispose(&info); > free(name); > > - return rc; > + return rc ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS; > } > And here too. Thanks and regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |